Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32050577›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2020

The Effects of Community Home Visit and Peer Group Nutrition Intervention Delivery Platforms on Nutrition Outcomes in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Amynah Janmohamed, Nazia Sohani, Zohra S Lassi, Zulfiqar A Bhutta

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Characteristics of house calls in Brazil: analysis of PMAQ-AB external evaluation cycles.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Participatory, Needs-Based Approach to Breastfeeding Training for Confinement Centres.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amynah JanmohamedCentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto M5G 2L3, Canada.
Nazia SohaniCentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto M5G 2L3, Canada.
Zohra S LassiRobinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaid, 5006, Australia.
Zulfiqar A BhuttaCentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto M5G 2L3, Canada.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1137750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weak delivery systems reduce the potential of evidence-supp orted interventions to improve nutrition. We synthesized the evidence for the effectiveness of nutrition-specific intervention delivery platforms for improving nutrition outcomes in low and middle-income countries (LMIC). A systematic literature search for studies published from 1997 to June 2018 resulted in the inclusion of 83 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-randomized, and controlled before-after studies across a variety of delivery platforms. In this paper, we report on meta-analysed outcomes for community health worker (CHW) home visits and mother/peer group delivery platforms. Compared to care as usual, CHW home visits increased early initiation of breastfeeding (EIBF) (OR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.12, 1.99; n = 10 RCTs) and exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) (OR: 4.42; 95% CI: 2.28, 8.56; n = 9 RCTs) and mother/peer groups were effective for improving children's minimum dietary diversity (OR: 2.34; 95% CI: 1.17, 4.70; n = 4) and minimum meal frequency (OR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.61, 3.31; n = 3). Pooled estimates from studies using both home visit and group platforms showed positive results for EIBF (OR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.12, 4.05;

Indexed as

Breast FeedingChild Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaCommunity Health WorkersHouse CallsIncomeNutritional StatusSocial ClassChildChild, PreschoolCommunity Health ServicesDelivery of Health CareDeveloping CountriesHealth PromotionHumansInfantMothersdeliveryinterventionlow and middle-income countrynutritionsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32050577
PMCPMC7071285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.