ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020
Clinical Performance of Zygomatic Implants-Retrospective Multicenter Study.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07258940 (A 1-year Prospective Multicenter Clinical Investigation to Assess Safety, Performance and Clinical Benefits of the NobelZygoma TiUltra Implant System in the Rehabilitation of Severely Atrophic Maxillae), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A 1-year Prospective Multicenter Clinical Investigation to Assess Safety, Performance and Clinical Benefits of the NobelZygoma TiUltra Implant System in the Rehabilitation of Severely Atrophic Maxillae
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Evaluation of surgical techniques in survival rate and complications of zygomatic implants for the rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: a systematic review.International journal of implant dentistry · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical outcomes of implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation of severely atrophic maxilla: A systematic review.Journal of Indian Prosthodontic SocietyPooled it
- Z-classification: an anatomy-based ridge-sinus-zygoma classification and decision funnel for zygomatic implantology.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Review
- Bone Resorption Assessment Following Zygomatic Implants Surgery over 10 Years of Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Rehabilitating Patients with Atrophic Maxillae via Zygomatic Implants.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Long-Term Success and Patient-Related Outcomes of Zygomatic Implants in Atrophic Maxillary Ridges.Cureus · 2024Article
- The Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Assisted by Dynamic Computer-Aided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Round and flat zygomatic implants: effectiveness after a 1-year follow-up non-interventional study.International journal of implant dentistry · 2022Article
- Review
- Treating severe periodontitis with staged load applied implant restoration: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2020Article
- Science, Innovation and Education as Pillars of High-Quality Implant Dentistry: Overcoming Challenges through Innovation Dictates Trends.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Comparative evaluation of extrasinus versus intrasinus approach for zygomatic implant placement.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The main objective of this analysis was to evaluate (1) implant survival, (2) biologic complications, and (3) demographics associated with zygomatic implants placed according to the zygomatic anatomy-guided approach (ZAGA). This retrospective multicenter study reviewed data from the charts of 82 consecutive patients who had received 182 zygomatic implants. Patients were fully edentulous (62.2%), partially edentulous (22.0%), or had failing dentition (15.9%). Most patients (87.5%) did not have previous sinusitis and 11.3% had been previously treated for it. Additionally, about half of the patients (53.8%) did not present periodontal pathology, and one-third (36.3%) did, but were subsequently treated. Most implants (93.8%) were loaded immediately, i.e., within 48 h of placement. Implants were followed for 10.5 ± 7.2 months, and all were recorded as surviving and stable at last follow-up. Post-operative complications were infrequent and included sinusitis (10.1%) and peri-implant hyperplasia (0.8%). The low complication rate and 100% implant survival and stability indicate that zygomatic implants offer a viable treatment option when performing graftless restoration of severely resorbed maxilla, including immediate loading protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.