Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32050090›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2020

Accelerated surgery versus standard care in hip fracture (HIP ATTACK): an international, randomised, controlled trial.

HIP ATTACK Investigators

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 163 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
163citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02027896 nacompletednot on this map

HIP Fracture Accelerated Surgical TreaTment And Care tracK (HIP ATTACK) Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2014 to 2022Enrolled3,001ConditionsHip FracturesArmsAccelerated medical clearance and surgery
NCT07228663 phase3not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Rivaroxaban Plus Acetylsalicylic Acid Versus Standard of Care for Arterial and Venous Cardiovascular Prevention After Hip Fracture Surgery in Patients With Myocardial Injury: a Pilot Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsHip Fracture Surgery, Cardiovascular Prevention, Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)Armsrivaroxaban and ASA, Low-molecular weight heparin, Fondaparinux, Direct Oral Anticoagulant (DOAC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

163 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Synthesis of the evidence on the impact of pre-operative direct oral anticoagulants on patient health outcomes after hip fracture surgery: rapid systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Waiting time and mortality after hip fracture: findings from a large single-center cohort study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  14. Hip fracture surgery within 24 hours: no association between time to surgery and mortality in a real-world cohort.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  15. Impact of operative timing for proximal humerus fracture dislocations on development of neurologic injury.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Time to surgery and its impact on length of stay and mortality for neck of femur fractures at a major trauma centre.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

HIP ATTACK Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObservational studies have suggested that accelerated surgery is associated with improved outcomes in patients with a hip fracture. The HIP ATTACK trial assessed whether accelerated surgery could reduce mortality and major complications.

methodsHIP ATTACK was an international, randomised, controlled trial done at 69 hospitals in 17 countries. Patients with a hip fracture that required surgery and were aged 45 years or older were eligible. Research personnel randomly assigned patients (1:1) through a central computerised randomisation system using randomly varying block sizes to either accelerated surgery (goal of surgery within 6 h of diagnosis) or standard care. The coprimary outcomes were mortality and a composite of major complications (ie, mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, venous thromboembolism, sepsis, pneumonia, life-threatening bleeding, and major bleeding) at 90 days after randomisation. Patients, health-care providers, and study staff were aware of treatment assignment, but outcome adjudicators were masked to treatment allocation. Patients were analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02027896).

findingsBetween March 14, 2014, and May 24, 2019, 27 701 patients were screened, of whom 7780 were eligible. 2970 of these were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive accelerated surgery (n=1487) or standard care (n=1483). The median time from hip fracture diagnosis to surgery was 6 h (IQR 4-9) in the accelerated-surgery group and 24 h (10-42) in the standard-care group (p<0·0001). 140 (9%) patients assigned to accelerated surgery and 154 (10%) assigned to standard care died, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0·91 (95% CI 0·72 to 1·14) and absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 1% (-1 to 3; p=0·40). Major complications occurred in 321 (22%) patients assigned to accelerated surgery and 331 (22%) assigned to standard care, with an HR of 0·97 (0·83 to 1·13) and an ARR of 1% (-2 to 4; p=0·71).

interpretationAmong patients with a hip fracture, accelerated surgery did not significantly lower the risk of mortality or a composite of major complications compared with standard care.

fundingCanadian Institutes of Health Research.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, HipCardiovascular DiseasesComorbidityDeliriumDementiaDiabetes MellitusEarly Medical InterventionFemaleFemoral Neck FracturesFracture Fixation, InternalHemiarthroplastyHip FracturesHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.