Trial reportLancet (London, England)2020
Accelerated surgery versus standard care in hip fracture (HIP ATTACK): an international, randomised, controlled trial.
Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 163 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
HIP Fracture Accelerated Surgical TreaTment And Care tracK (HIP ATTACK) Trial
Rivaroxaban Plus Acetylsalicylic Acid Versus Standard of Care for Arterial and Venous Cardiovascular Prevention After Hip Fracture Surgery in Patients With Myocardial Injury: a Pilot Randomized Trial
Who cites it
163 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- What patient reported outcome measures are used in clinical trials in hip fracture? A systematic mapping review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Four eras of geriatric femoral neck fracture surgery: a bibliometric analysis of half-century research evolution and emerging frontiers.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Intravenous Non-Opioid Analgesics for Postoperative Pain Management of in Patients Undergoing Hip Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Pooled it
- Perioperative interventions to improve early mobilisation and physical function after hip fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Age and ageing · 2023Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for Hip Fracture Detection and Outcome Prediction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2023Pooled it
- Synthesis of the evidence on the impact of pre-operative direct oral anticoagulants on patient health outcomes after hip fracture surgery: rapid systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022Pooled it
- Effects of Orthogeriatric Care Models on Outcomes of Hip Fracture Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Calcified tissue international · 2022Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of fast track surgery (FTS) in patients after hip fracture surgery: a meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2021Pooled it
- Hip Fracture Intervention Study for Prevention of Hypotension Trial: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.A&A practice · 2025Trial
- Fast Track Pathway to Accelerated Cholecystectomy Versus Standard of Care for Acute Cholecystitis (FAST) pilot trial.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgieTrial
- Secondary fragility fractures after hip fracture surgery in four thousand, four hundred and eighteen older adults: risk factors and internal validation of an interpretable machine-learning model.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Waiting time and mortality after hip fracture: findings from a large single-center cohort study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Hip fracture surgery within 24 hours: no association between time to surgery and mortality in a real-world cohort.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Impact of operative timing for proximal humerus fracture dislocations on development of neurologic injury.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Article
- Full-Body Versus Local Wipe Disinfection With Chlorhexidine Gluconate: No Difference in Surgical Site Infection After Acute Hip Fracture Surgery.International wound journal · 2026Article
- Time to surgery and its impact on length of stay and mortality for neck of femur fractures at a major trauma centre.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Impact of Preoperative Waiting Time on Intraoperative Blood Transfusion in Older Patients with Hip Fracture: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Timing of surgery in patients with hip fracture: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (2017-2024).EFORT open reviews · 2026Article
103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObservational studies have suggested that accelerated surgery is associated with improved outcomes in patients with a hip fracture. The HIP ATTACK trial assessed whether accelerated surgery could reduce mortality and major complications.
methodsHIP ATTACK was an international, randomised, controlled trial done at 69 hospitals in 17 countries. Patients with a hip fracture that required surgery and were aged 45 years or older were eligible. Research personnel randomly assigned patients (1:1) through a central computerised randomisation system using randomly varying block sizes to either accelerated surgery (goal of surgery within 6 h of diagnosis) or standard care. The coprimary outcomes were mortality and a composite of major complications (ie, mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, venous thromboembolism, sepsis, pneumonia, life-threatening bleeding, and major bleeding) at 90 days after randomisation. Patients, health-care providers, and study staff were aware of treatment assignment, but outcome adjudicators were masked to treatment allocation. Patients were analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02027896).
findingsBetween March 14, 2014, and May 24, 2019, 27 701 patients were screened, of whom 7780 were eligible. 2970 of these were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive accelerated surgery (n=1487) or standard care (n=1483). The median time from hip fracture diagnosis to surgery was 6 h (IQR 4-9) in the accelerated-surgery group and 24 h (10-42) in the standard-care group (p<0·0001). 140 (9%) patients assigned to accelerated surgery and 154 (10%) assigned to standard care died, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0·91 (95% CI 0·72 to 1·14) and absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 1% (-1 to 3; p=0·40). Major complications occurred in 321 (22%) patients assigned to accelerated surgery and 331 (22%) assigned to standard care, with an HR of 0·97 (0·83 to 1·13) and an ARR of 1% (-2 to 4; p=0·71).
interpretationAmong patients with a hip fracture, accelerated surgery did not significantly lower the risk of mortality or a composite of major complications compared with standard care.
fundingCanadian Institutes of Health Research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32050090What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.