Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32050001›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Autoantibodies as diagnostic markers and potential drivers of inflammation in ulcerative colitis.

Henrika Jodeleit, Lisa Milchram, Regina Soldo, Gabriel Beikircher, Silvia Schönthaler, Omar Al-Amodi, Eckhard Wolf, Florian Beigel, Andreas Weinhäusel, Matthias Siebeck and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Henrika JodeleitDepartment of General, Visceral und Transplantation Surgery, Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lisa MilchramAustrian Institute of Technology GmbH (AIT), Giefinggasse, Wien, Austria.
Regina SoldoAustrian Institute of Technology GmbH (AIT), Giefinggasse, Wien, Austria.
Gabriel BeikircherAustrian Institute of Technology GmbH (AIT), Giefinggasse, Wien, Austria.
Silvia SchönthalerAustrian Institute of Technology GmbH (AIT), Giefinggasse, Wien, Austria.
Omar Al-AmodiDepartment of General, Visceral und Transplantation Surgery, Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Eckhard WolfInstitute of Molecular Animal Breeding and Biotechnology, Laboratory for Functional Genome Analysis (LAFUGA), Gene Center, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Florian BeigelDepartment of Medicine II, Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich, München, Germany.
Andreas WeinhäuselAustrian Institute of Technology GmbH (AIT), Giefinggasse, Wien, Austria.
Matthias SiebeckDepartment of General, Visceral und Transplantation Surgery, Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Roswitha GroppDepartment of General, Visceral und Transplantation Surgery, Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4756-261X
Austrian Institute of Technology · ATLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEBavarian State Research Center for Agriculture · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, no comprehensive analysis of autoantibodies in sera of patients with ulcerative colitis has been conducted. To analyze the spectrum of autoantibodies and to elucidate their role serum-IgG from UC patients (n = 49) and non-UC donors (n = 23) were screened by using a human protein microarray. Screening yielded a remarkable number of 697 differentially-reactive at the nominal 0·01 significance level (FDR<0·1) of the univariate test between the UC and the non-UC group. CD99 emerged as a biomarker to discriminate between both groups (p = 1e-04, AUC = 0·8). In addition, cytokines, chemokines and growth factors were analyzed by Olink's Proseek® Multiplex Inflammation-I 96×96 immuno-qPCR assay and 31 genes were significant at the nominal 0.05 level of the univariate test to discriminate between UC and non-UC donors. MCP-3, HGF and CXCL-9 were identified as the most significant markers to discriminate between UC patients with clinically active and inactive disease. Levels of CXCL10 (cor = 0.3; p = 0.02), CCL25 (cor = 0.25; p = 0.04) and CCL28 (cor = 0.3; p = 0.02) correlated positively with levels of anti CD99. To assess whether autoantibodies are detectable prior to diagnosis with UC, sera from nine donors at two different time points (T-early, median 21 months and T-late, median 6 months) were analyzed. 1201 features were identified with higher reactivity in samples at time points closer to clinical UC presentation. In vitro, additional challenge of peripheral mononuclear cells with CD99 did not activate CD4+ T cells but induced the secretion of IL-10 (-CD99: 20.21±20.25; +CD99: 130.20±89.55; mean ±sd; p = 0.015). To examine the effect of CD99 in vivo, inflammation and autoantibody levels were examined in NOD/ScidIL2Rγnull mice reconstituted with PBMC from UC donors (NSG-UC). Additional challenge with CD99 aggravated disease symptoms and pathological phenotype as indicated by the elevated clinical score (-CD99: 1·85 ± 1·94; +CD99: 4·25 ± 1·48) and histological score (-CD99: 2·16 ± 0·83; +CD99: 3·15 ± 1·16, p = 0·01). Furthermore, levels of anti-CD99 antibodies increased (Control: 398 ± 323; mean MFI ± sd; Ethanol + PBS: 358 ±316; Ethanol + CD99: 1363 ± 1336; Control versus Ethanol + CD99: p = 0.03). In a highly inflammatory environment, frequencies of pro-inflammatory M1 monocytes (CD14+ CD64+: unchallenged 8.09±4.72; challenged 14.2±8.62; p = 0.07; CD14+ CD1a+: unchallenged 16.29 ±6.97; challenged 43.81±14.4, p = 0.0003) increased and levels of autoantibodies in serum decreased in the NSG-UC mouse model. These results suggest that autoantibodies are potent biomarkers to discriminate between UC and non-UC and indicate risk to develop UC. In an inflammatory environment, auto-antibodies may promote the pathological phenotype by activating M1 monocytes in the NSG-UC animal model and also in patients with UC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnimalsAutoantibodiesBiomarkersCells, CulturedColitis, UlcerativeCytokinesFemaleHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDMiddle AgedAutoantibodiesBiomarkersCytokines

Identifiers

PMID32050001
PMCPMC7015398
OpenAlexW3006180091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.