Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32049861›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2020

Intrauterine double-balloon tamponade vs gauze packing in the management of placenta previa: A multicentre randomized controlled trial.

Jing Wei, Yimin Dai, Zhiqun Wang, Ning Gu, Hongfang Ju, Youdi Xu, Biyun Xu, Yali Hu

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intrauterine balloon tamponade versus uterine gauze packing for postpartum hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Efficacy of King's Combined Uterine Suture in Managing Placenta Accreta: A Retrospective Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jing WeiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing.
Yimin DaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing.
Zhiqun WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing.
Ning GuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing.
Hongfang JuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taizhou People's Hospital, Affiliated to Nantong University, Taizhou.
Youdi XuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University.
Biyun XuDepartment of Biomedical Statistics, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yali HuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing.
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CNNanjing Medical University · CNTaizhou People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a newly designed intrauterine double-balloon catheter to arrest postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) following cesarean delivery (CD) for placenta previa.

methodsWe conducted an open-label, multicenter randomized controlled trial in two referral centers and one general hospital. Women with continuous bleeding after placental delivery following CD for placenta previa, who failed to respond to uterotonics, suturing and uterine devascularization, and in the absence of suspected deeply invasive accreta were eligible subjects. Eligible subjects were randomized to receive intrauterine double-balloon catheter (n = 102) or gauze packing (n = 102). The main outcome was the rate of successful hemostasis without the need for additional surgical interventions. The secondary outcomes included the volume of blood loss during and after CD, the rate of PPH, incidence and amount of blood transfusion, hysterectomy, surgical complications, intensive care unit admission, need for re-laparotomy, length of hospital stay, and readmission.

resultsThe 224 participants were recruited before delivery, with 20 excluded (14 cases bleeding stopped after uterotonics and/or local myometrium sutures and 6 patients with placental increta). Finally, 102 women were assigned in catheter group and 102 others in gauze group. There was no difference in the rate of successful hemostasis in the catheter and gauze groups (93.1% vs 91.2%, P = .80). Compared with those in the gauze group, women in the catheter group showed significantly less blood loss within 24 hours postpartum (895 [612.3-1297.8] vs 1156 [882.5-1453.3] ml, P < .01), lower rate of PPH ≥1000 ml (42.2% vs 63.7%, P < .01). Accordingly, women in the catheter group had significantly less maternal adverse events such as postpartum anemia, puerperal morbidity, and postpartum pain.

conclusionUterine tamponade using a double-balloon catheter was as effective as gauze packing in hemostasis, and appeared to be superior in reducing postpartum blood loss and pain following CD for placenta previa. Using double-balloon catheter in managing PPH in this situation may be a preferable alternative to minimize maternal morbidity.

Indexed as

Placenta PreviaAdultCesarean SectionFemaleHumansPostpartum HemorrhagePregnancyUterine Balloon Tamponade

Identifiers

PMID32049861
PMCPMC7035072
OpenAlexW3006625251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.