Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32049815›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2020

Effectiveness, immunogenicity, and safety of influenza vaccines with MF59 adjuvant in healthy people of different age groups: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jing Yang, Jiayou Zhang, Tian Han, Chen Liu, Xinghang Li, Luyao Yan, Baifeng Yang, Xiaoming Yang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Comprehensive Review of mRNA Vaccines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Factors influencing the immunogenicity of influenza vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Design of a Multi-epitope Vaccine AgainstInternational journal of peptide research and therapeutics · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jing YangNational Institute of Engineering Technology Research in Combination Vaccine.
Jiayou ZhangNational Institute of Engineering Technology Research in Combination Vaccine.
Tian HanNational Institute of Engineering Technology Research in Combination Vaccine.
Chen LiuNational Institute of Engineering Technology Research in Combination Vaccine.
Xinghang LiNational Institute of Engineering Technology Research in Combination Vaccine.
Luyao YanNational Institute of Engineering Technology Research in Combination Vaccine.
Baifeng YangNational Institute of Engineering Technology Research in Combination Vaccine.
Xiaoming YangNational Institute of Engineering Technology Research in Combination Vaccine.
Wuhan Institute of Bioengineering · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfluenza is a severe disease burden among all age groups. This study aimed to review the efficacy of inactivated influenza vaccines with MF59 adjuvant and non-adjuvanted inactivated influenza vaccines among all age groups against specific influenza vaccine strains.

methodsLiterature search of PubMed, Embase, Medline, OVID, and Cochrane Library Trials (CENTRAL) was implemented up to March 1, 2019. Homogeneity qualified studies were included forData were extracted such as study country location, demographic characteristics, and measure outcomes, and were analyzed by a random effect model and sensitivity analyses to identify heterogeneity. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.

resultsWe retrieved 1,021 publications and selected 31 studies for full review, including 17 trials for meta-analysis and 6 trials for qualitative synthesis. MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccines demonstrated better immunogenicity against specific vaccine virus strains compared to non-adjuvanted influenza vaccine both in healthy adult group (RR = 2.10; 95% CI: 1.28-3.44) and the healthy aged (RR = 1.26; 95% CI: 1.10-1.44).

conclusionThe quality of evidence is moderate to high for seroconversion and seroprotection rates of influenza vaccine. MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccines are superior to non-adjuvanted influenza vaccines to enhance immune responses of vaccination in healthy adults and older adults, and could be considered for routine use especially the monovalent prepandemic influenza vaccines.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChildFemaleHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMaleMiddle AgedPolysorbatesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdjuvants, ImmunologicInfluenza VaccinesMF59 oil emulsionPolysorbatesSqualeneVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID32049815
PMCPMC7035094
OpenAlexW3006614329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.