Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32049789›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2020

Protective effect of rhubarb combined with ulinastatin for patients with sepsis.

Fulei Meng, Chongbo Du, Yuxiao Zhang, Shunyao Wang, Qingming Zhou, Liping Wu, Yanli Wang, Xiufen Yang

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fulei MengDepartment of Emergency.
Chongbo DuDepartment of Neurology.
Yuxiao ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Shunyao WangDepartment of Intensive Medicine.
Qingming ZhouDepartment of Intensive Medicine.
Liping WuDepartment of Intensive Medicine.
Yanli WangDepartment of Mental Health, First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang City, Hebei Province, China.
Xiufen YangDepartment of Intensive Medicine.
Hebei Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is the leading cause of death in critically ill patients. Ulinastatin (UTI), a protease inhibitor, and rhubarb, used as a traditional Chinese medication, are proved to be effective in treating sepsis, but the effect of the combination therapy of these two drugs on sepsis remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the combination treatment of UTI and rhubarb on sepsis patients.

methodsA total of 75 septic patients were randomly divided into control group, UTI group, Rhubarb group, and UTI plus Rhubarb group. Clinical data and score of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) were collected; lymphocyte subtypes in the peripheral blood were analyzed before and after the 5-day treatment in the Intensive Care Unit.

resultsAll the therapeutic interventions (UTI alone, rhubarb alone, or UTI plus rhubarb) significantly reduced the levels of C-Reactive protein, white blood cell density, lactic acid, and APACH II scores, and elevated the levels of CD4/CD8, but only UTI plus rhubarb treatment obviously decreased the level of procalcitonin.

conclusionThis study suggested that the combination of UTI and rhubarb may be a promising therapeutic scheme to ameliorate sepsis.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCritical IllnessDrugs, Chinese HerbalDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGlycoproteinsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRheumSepsisTreatment OutcomeTrypsin InhibitorsDrugs, Chinese HerbalGlycoproteinsTrypsin Inhibitorsurinastatin

Identifiers

PMID32049789
PMCPMC7035124
OpenAlexW3006327657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.