Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32049632›Full record

ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2020

Simple, Mobile-based Artificial Intelligence Algo

Bhavana Sosale, Sosale Ramachandra Aravind, Hemanth Murthy, Srikanth Narayana, Usha Sharma, Sahana G V Gowda, Muralidhar Naveenam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bhavana SosaleDiabetology, Diacon Hospital, Bangalore, India bhavanasosale@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3658-1252
Sosale Ramachandra AravindDiabetology, Diacon Hospital, Bangalore, India.
Hemanth MurthyOphthalmology, Retina Institute of Karnataka, Bangalore, India.
Srikanth NarayanaOphthalmology, Diacon Hospital, Bangalore, India.
Usha SharmaOphthalmology, Diacon Hospital, Bangalore, India.
Sahana G V GowdaOphthalmology, Diacon Hospital, Bangalore, India.
Muralidhar NaveenamOphthalmology, Retina Institute of Karnataka, Bangalore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of the offline smart phone-based Medios artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy (DR) using non-mydriatic (NM) retinal images.

methodsThis cross-sectional study prospectively enrolled 922 individuals with diabetes mellitus. NM retinal images (disc and macula centered) from each eye were captured using the Remidio NM fundus-on-phone (FOP) camera. The images were run offline and the diagnosis of the AI was recorded (DR present or absent). The diagnosis of the AI was compared with the image diagnosis of five retina specialists (majority diagnosis considered as ground truth).

resultsAnalysis included images from 900 individuals (252 had DR). For any DR, the sensitivity and specificity of the AI algorithm was found to be 83.3% (95% CI 80.9% to 85.7%) and 95.5% (95% CI 94.1% to 96.8%). The sensitivity and specificity of the AI algorithm in detecting referable DR (RDR) was 93% (95% CI 91.3% to 94.7%) and 92.5% (95% CI 90.8% to 94.2%).

conclusionThe Medios AI has a high sensitivity and specificity in the detection of RDR using NM retinal images.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic RetinopathyAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSensitivity and Specificityalgorithmsnon-mydriatic cameraretinopathy diagnosistechnology and diabetes

Identifiers

PMID32049632
PMCPMC7039584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.