Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32049593›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2020

Parallel distributed networks dissociate episodic and social functions within the individual.

Lauren M DiNicola, Rodrigo M Braga, Randy L Buckner

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04748146 (CAUSAL MECHANISMS OF DISTRIBUTED BRAIN NETWORK FUNCTION DURING EPISODIC MEMORY RETRIEVAL), which is not on this map. Cited by 134 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04748146 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Causal mechanisms of distributed brain network function during episodic memory retrieval

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled0ConditionsEpisodic MemoryArmsBrain stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. What episodic memory reveals about the default mode network.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Individualized Mapping of Functional Brain Networks in Older Adulthood.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lauren M DiNicolaDepartment of Psychology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-7562-0755
Rodrigo M BragaDepartment of Psychology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Randy L BucknerDepartment of Psychology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Funding

The neural network of OCD, linking NHP and human studiesP50MH106435 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI STEVEN A RASMUSSEN · 2015 to 2026
$28.9M
Upgrade Siemens MAGNETOM Trio to MAGNETOM Prisma Fit 3T Human MRI SystemS10OD020039 · OD · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI BUCKNER, RANDY L · 2015 to 2015
$600k
Causal mechanisms of distributed brain network function during episodic memory retrievalK99MH117226 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BRAGA, RODRIGO M · 2018 to 2019
$254k
NIH HHS S10 OD020039NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH117226NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH106435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Association cortex is organized into large-scale distributed networks. One such network, the default network (DN), is linked to diverse forms of internal mentation, opening debate about whether shared or distinct anatomy supports multiple forms of cognition. Using within-individual analysis procedures that preserve idiosyncratic anatomical details, we probed whether multiple tasks from two domains, episodic projection and theory of mind (ToM), rely on the same or distinct networks. In an initial experiment (6 subjects, each scanned 4 times), we found evidence that episodic projection and ToM tasks activate separate regions distributed throughout the cortex, with adjacent regions in parietal, temporal, prefrontal, and midline zones. These distinctions were predicted by the hypothesis that the DN comprises two parallel, interdigitated networks. One network, linked to parahippocampal cortex (PHC), is preferentially recruited during episodic projection, including both remembering and imagining the future. A second juxtaposed network, which includes the temporoparietal junction (TPJ), is differentially engaged during multiple forms of ToM. In two prospectively acquired independent experiments, we replicated and triplicated the dissociation (each with 6 subjects scanned 4 times). Furthermore, the dissociation was found in all zones when analyzed independently, including robustly in midline regions previously described as hubs. The TPJ-linked network is interwoven with the PHC-linked network across the cortex, making clear why it is difficult to fully resolve the two networks in group-averaged or lower-resolution data. These results refine our understanding of the functional-anatomical organization of association cortex and raise fundamental questions about how specialization might arise in parallel, juxtaposed association networks.

Indexed as

ConnectomeMemory, EpisodicSocial PerceptionAdolescentAdultCerebral CortexDefault Mode NetworkFemaleHumansImaginationMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMental RecallNerve NetTheory of MindYoung Adultassociation cortexdefault networkprospectionrememberingtheory of mind

Identifiers

PMID32049593
PMCPMC7099479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.