Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32049495›Full record

ArticleACS nano2020

Pervasive Genomic Damage in Experimental Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Therapeutic Potential of a Mechanistic-Based Carbon Nanoparticle.

Prakash Dharmalingam, Girish Talakatta, Joy Mitra, Haibo Wang, Paul J Derry, Lizanne Greer Nilewski, Emily A McHugh, Roderic H Fabian, Kimberly Mendoza, Velmarini Vasquez and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Telomerase mRNA therapy protects human skin against radiation-induced DNA damage.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Nanobiotechnologies for stroke treatment.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Prakash DharmalingamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas 77030, United States.
Girish TalakattaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas 77030, United States.
Joy MitraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas 77030, United States.
Haibo WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas 77030, United States.
Paul J DerryInstitute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Houston, Texas 77030, United States.
Lizanne Greer NilewskiDepartment of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0949-9170
Emily A McHughDepartment of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, United States.
Roderic H FabianDepartment of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, and Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas 77030, United States.
Kimberly MendozaDepartment of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, United States.
Velmarini VasquezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas 77030, United States.
Pavana M HegdeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas 77030, United States.
Eugenia KakadiarisDepartment of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, United States.
Trenton RoyDepartment of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, United States.
Istvan BoldoghDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555, United States.
Venkatesh L HegdeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas 77030, United States.
Sankar MitraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas 77030, United States.
James M TourDepartments of Chemistry, Computer Science, Materials Science and NanoEngineering, Smalley-Curl Institute and the NanoCarbon Center, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8479-9328
Thomas A KentInstitute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Houston, Texas 77030, United States.
Muralidhar L HegdeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas 77030, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7333-8123

Funding

Novel Carbon Nanozyme Mechanisms for Traumatic Brain InjuryR01NS094535 · NINDS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI HEGDE, MURALIDHAR L, KENT, THOMAS · 2015 to 2024
$4.1M
Etiological Linkage of DNA Damage/Repair Deficiency in Neurodegenerative DiseasesR01NS088645 · NINDS · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HEGDE, MURALIDHAR L · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS088645NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapy for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains elusive, in part dependent on the severity of the hemorrhage itself as well as multiple deleterious effects of blood and its breakdown products such as hemin and free iron. While oxidative injury and genomic damage have been seen following ICH, the details of this injury and implications remain unclear. Here, we discovered that, while free iron produced mostly reactive oxygen species (ROS)-related single-strand DNA breaks, hemin unexpectedly induced rapid and persistent nuclear and mitochondrial double-strand breaks (DSBs) in neuronal and endothelial cell genomes and in mouse brains following experimental ICH comparable to that seen with γ radiation and DNA-complexing chemotherapies. Potentially as a result of persistent DSBs and the DNA damage response, hemin also resulted in senescence phenotype in cultured neurons and endothelial cells. Subsequent resistance to ferroptosis reported in other senescent cell types was also observed here in neurons. While antioxidant therapy prevented senescence, cells became sensitized to ferroptosis. To address both senescence and resistance to ferroptosis, we synthesized a modified, catalytic, and rapidly internalized carbon nanomaterial, poly(ethylene glycol)-conjugated hydrophilic carbon clusters (PEG-HCC) by covalently bonding the iron chelator, deferoxamine (DEF). This multifunctional nanoparticle, DEF-HCC-PEG, protected cells from both senescence and ferroptosis and restored nuclear and mitochondrial genome integrity

Indexed as

AnimalsCarbonCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCellular SenescenceCerebral HemorrhageDeferoxamineDNA Breaks, Single-StrandedDNA DamageHeminHumansIronMiceMitochondriaNanoparticlesPolyethylene GlycolsCarbonDeferoxamineHeminIronPolyethylene GlycolsReactive Oxygen Speciesferroptosisgenome damageheminintracerebral hemorrhagenanomaterialsenescence

Identifiers

PMID32049495
PMCPMC7850811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.