ArticleJAMA cardiology2020
Association of Monogenic vs Polygenic Hypercholesterolemia With Risk of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.
Article in JAMA cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 110 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
110 citing papers in PubMed, 233 citations in OpenAlex.
- Experimental pasta as an innovative approach to cholesterol reduction in patients with metabolic syndrome, with and without major psychiatric disorders: A randomized controlled trial supported byEuropean psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025Trial
- Genetic screening of children for familial hypercholesterolaemia: the VRONI study.European heart journal · 2026Article
- Genetic Spectrum of Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Russian North-West Registry: Focus on Correlation Between Clinical and Genetic Diagnosis.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- From Phenotype to Genotype and Beyond: Insights into Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Familial Hypertriglyceridemia.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Review
- Combining Genomics With Lipid and Inflammatory Biomarkers to Predict Coronary Artery Disease Risk: UK Biobank Study.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Genetic determinants of plasma lipids in Greenlanders.Current opinion in lipidology · 2026Review
- Risk Haplotype of BTNL2 Predisposes Male Patients to NSTEMI: A Genetic and Functional Study.Research square · 2026Article
- Prevalence and prognosis of genetically proven familial hypercholesterolemia in subjects with angiographically documented premature coronary artery disease.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Polygenic risk scores: Navigating the future of precision medicine through economic, ethical, and scientific advancements.iScience · 2026Review
- Pathogenicity analysis and functional prediction of a rare LDLR variant in familial hypercholesterolemia combined with Wilson disease.Genes & genomics · 2026Article
- Universal Screening for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Preschool Children and Their Families in Slovenia (FH-FAMILIES)-A Protocol for a Study of Four-Stage Screening Program.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Prevalence and Discrepancy between Genotype and Phenotype. Findings of the Population-based Hamburg City Health Study.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025Observational
- Gene therapy and genome editing for lipoprotein disorders.European heart journal · 2025Review
- Genetic Determinants of the Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Phenotype.Annals of human genetics · 2025Review
- Polygenic Modulation of Monogenic Diseases: Familial Hypercholesterolemia as the Exemplar.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Carotid Plaque, Coronary Calcium, and Coronary Plaque: Triple Threat of Atherosclerosis in Familial Hypercholesterolemia.JACC. Asia · 2025Article
- Digenic Overlap Syndrome Masquerading as Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Longitudinal Data From the KETO-CTA Study: Plaque Predicts Plaque, ApoB Does Not.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- Review
50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is associated with lifelong elevations in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, many individuals with hypercholesterolemia have a polygenic rather than a monogenic cause for their condition. It is unclear if a genetic variant for hypercholesterolemia alters the risk of CVD. Objectives: To assess whether a genetic variant for hypercholesterolemia alters the risk of atherosclerotic CVD and to evaluate how this risk compares with that of nongenetic hypercholesterolemia. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this genetic-association, case-control, cohort study, individuals aged 40 to 69 years were recruited by the UK Biobank from across the United Kingdom between March 13, 2006, and October 1, 2010, and followed up until March 31, 2017. Genotyping array and exome sequencing data from the UK Biobank cohort were used to identify individuals with monogenic (LDLR, APOB, and PCSK9) or polygenic hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C polygenic score >95th percentile based on 223 single-nucleotide variants in the entire cohort). The data were analyzed from July 1, 2019, to December 30, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: The study investigated the association of genotype with the risk of coronary and carotid revascularization, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and all-cause mortality among the overall study population and among participants with monogenic FH (n = 277), polygenic hypercholesterolemia (n = 2379), or hypercholesterolemia with undetermined cause (n = 2232) at comparable levels of LDL-C measured at study enrollment. Results: For the 48 741 individuals with genotyping array and exome sequencing data, the mean (SD) age was 56.6 (8.0) years, and 54.5% were female (n = 26 541 of 48 741). A monogenic FH variant for hypercholesterolemia was found in 277 individuals (0.57%, 1 in 176 individuals). Participants with monogenic FH were significantly more likely than those without monogenic FH to experience an atherosclerotic CVD event at 55 years or younger (17 of 277 [6.1%] vs 988 of 48 464 [2.0%]; P < .001). Compared with the general population, both monogenic and polygenic hypercholesterolemia were associated with an increased risk of CVD events. Moreover, among individuals with comparable levels of LDL-C, both monogenic (hazard ratio, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.34-2.77; P < .001) and polygenic hypercholesterolemia (hazard ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.03-1.55; P = .03) were significantly associated with an increased risk of CVD events compared with the risk of such events in individuals with hypercholesterolemia without an identified genetic cause. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that among individuals with hypercholesterolemia, genetic determinants of LDL-C levels may impose additional risk of CVD. Thus, understanding the possible genetic cause of hypercholesterolemia may provide important prognostic information to treat patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.