ArticleJAMA dermatology2020
Sexual and Gender Minority Populations and Skin Cancer-New Data and Renewed Priorities.
Article in JAMA dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experiences of Full Body Skin Examinations among Sexual and Gender Minority Patients in Dermatology: A Qualitative Study.Research square · 2026Article
- Demographics of Skin Cancer Knowledge Among Middle and High Schoolers in Texas.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2023Article
- Towards gender equity in artificial intelligence and machine learning applications in dermatology.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Errors in Population Numbers and Missing Data.JAMA dermatology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.