Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32049260›Full record

ArticleRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo2020

A Real Time PCR strategy for the detection and quantification of Candida albicans in human blood.

Felipe Delatorre Busser, Vivian Caso Coelho, Claudia de Abreu Fonseca, Gilda Maria Barbaro Del Negro, Maria Aparecida Shikanai-Yasuda, Marta Heloisa Lopes, Marcello Mihailenko Chaves Magri, Vera Lucia Teixeira de Freitas

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Polymers · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Biosensors and Diagnostics for Fungal Detection.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felipe Delatorre BusserUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório de Investigação Médica em Imunologia (LIM 48), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2211-2690
Vivian Caso CoelhoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório de Investigação Médica em Imunologia (LIM 48), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Claudia de Abreu FonsecaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório de Investigação Médica em Imunologia (LIM 48), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gilda Maria Barbaro Del NegroUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório de Investigação Médica em Micologia (LIM 53), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Aparecida Shikanai-YasudaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório de Investigação Médica em Imunologia (LIM 48), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marta Heloisa LopesUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório de Investigação Médica em Imunologia (LIM 48), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcello Mihailenko Chaves MagriUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório de Investigação Médica em Imunologia (LIM 48), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vera Lucia Teixeira de FreitasUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Moléstias Infecciosas e Parasitárias, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1112-081X
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candidemia is a significant cause of bloodstream infections (BSI) in nosocomial settings. The identification of species can potentially improve the quality of care and decrease human mortality. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was evaluated for Candida albicans detection using culture suspensions containing C. albicans , spiked human blood, the cloned qPCR target fragment (ITS2 region) and the results of these assays were compared. The assays showed a good detection limit: C. albicans DNA extracted from yeast (sensitivity 0.2 CFU/µL), spiked human blood (sensitivity 10 CFU/mL), and cloned fragment of ITS2 region (sensitivity 20 target copies/μL). The efficiency of ITS2 fragment-qPCR ranged from 89.67 to 97.07, and the linearity (R2) of the standard curve ranged from 0.992 to 0.999. The results showed that this ITS2-qPCR has a great potential as a molecular prototype model for the development of a test to be applied in clinical practice, greatly reducing the time of candidemia diagnosis, which is extremely important in this clinical setting.

Indexed as

Candida albicansCandidemiaDNA, FungalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerHumansReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, FungalDNA, Ribosomal Spacer

Identifiers

PMID32049260
PMCPMC7014565
OpenAlexW3004473883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.