Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32048896›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2020

"There's Always Next Year": Primary Care Team and Parent Perspectives on the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine.

Julie H T Dang, Susan L Stewart, Dean A Blumberg, Hector P Rodriguez, Moon S Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. HPV Vaccination Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Among Clinic Teams in North Texas.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Implementation and evaluation of a multilevel intervention to increase uptake of the human papillomavirus vaccine among rural adolescents.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julie H T DangDavis Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0597-7457
Susan L StewartDavis School of Medicine, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California , Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1593-440X
Dean A BlumbergDavis Health Department of Pediatrics, University of California , Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4319-619X
Hector P RodriguezBerkeley, School of Public Health, Division of Health Policy and Management, University of California , Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6564-2229
Moon S ChenDavis Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0076-2550

Funding

Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Gina M Dayton · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acceptance of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among parents and clinicians is high, but uptake remains low. Little is known about organizational and primary care team factors that influence the uptake of the HPV vaccine. Interviews with clinicians, clinic support staff, and parents of adolescent patients were conducted to better understand the interrelationships among the people and the organizational processes that influence HPV vaccine uptake at the point of care. Between July 2016 and February 2017, semi-structured interviews of 40 participants (18 clinicians, 12 clinic support staff, and 10 parents of adolescent patients) in a primary care network were conducted. Organizational structures and processes, such as electronic provider reminders, availability of "vaccination only" appointments, and knowledgeable primary care team members contributed to HPV vaccine uptake. Consistently high support of HPV vaccination was found among key informants; however, rather than refuse HPV vaccination, parents are opting to delay vaccination to a future visit. When parents express the desire to delay, clinicians and care team members described often recommending addressing HPV vaccination at a future visit, giving parents the impression that receiving the vaccine was not time-sensitive for their child. Discordance in HPV vaccination recommendations among providers and clinic support staff may contribute to delayed HPV vaccination. Strong, high-quality HPV vaccine recommendations are needed from all primary team members. Clinic interventions to accelerate HPV vaccine uptake may benefit from a team-based approach where every member of the primary care team is delivering the same consistent messaging about the importance of timely HPV vaccination.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesAdolescentAmbulatory Care FacilitiesChildHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CareVaccinationPapillomavirus Vaccinesadolescent healthhealthcare teamHuman papillomavirusqualitative researchvaccination

Identifiers

PMID32048896
PMCPMC7484906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.