Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32048244›Full record

ReviewPulmonary therapy2020

Machine Learning for Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine: A Narrative Review.

Eric Mlodzinski, David J Stone, Leo A Celi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pulmonary therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. 21st century critical care medicine: An overview.World journal of critical care medicine · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eric MlodzinskiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. emlodzin@bidmc.harvard.edu.
David J StoneMIT Critical Data, Laboratory for Computational Physiology, Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Leo A CeliMIT Critical Data, Laboratory for Computational Physiology, Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.

Funding

Critical Care Informatics: Ethical considerations around the use and sharing of health-related dataR01EB017205 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CELI, LEO ANTHONY G, MARK, ROGER GREENWOOD · 2014 to 2021
$3.8M
ROLE OF TFII-I IN CRANIOFACIAL DEVELOPMENTR01DE017205 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI BAYARSAIHAN, DASHZEVEG · 2006 to 2009
$1.5M
CRCNS - Higher-Level Neural Specialization/Natural ShapeR01EY017205 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CONNOR, CHARLES E · 2005 to 2008
$1.3M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017205NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017205NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE017205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) is a discipline of computer science in which statistical methods are applied to data in order to classify, predict, or optimize, based on previously observed data. Pulmonary and critical care medicine have seen a surge in the application of this methodology, potentially delivering improvements in our ability to diagnose, treat, and better understand a multitude of disease states. Here we review the literature and provide a detailed overview of the recent advances in ML as applied to these areas of medicine. In addition, we discuss both the significant benefits of this work as well as the challenges in the implementation and acceptance of this non-traditional methodology for clinical purposes.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseComputed tomographyCritical careMachine learningMechanical ventilationNeural networksPulmonarySepsis

Identifiers

PMID32048244
PMCPMC7229087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.