ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2020
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Myelodysplastic Syndromes: the Move from Life Span to Health Span.
Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imetelstat improves patient-reported outcomes and quality of life in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: results from the phase III IMerge study.Haematologica · 2026Trial
- [Application of patient-reported-outcome in myelodysplastic syndromes].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe lack of fully effective therapies to alter the natural course of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) leads to chronic morbidity, mortality and affects quality of life (QoL). Since existing therapies outside of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are not curative, there is a growing interest in incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as meaningful endpoints for these patients in research and clinical practice. RECENT
findingsCurrently, there are limited numbers of studies reporting the impact of MDS therapeutics on PROs to guide clinical decision-making and increase patient satisfaction. However, clinical trials that have incorporated QoL outcomes have demonstrated positive results with the use of growth factors, hypomethylating agents, and lenalidomide. Here we review and highlight the importance of harnessing the power of PROs as part of a comprehensive efficacy evaluation to ultimately deliver superior patient-centered care across the spectrum of MDS. As our understanding of MDS continues to increase, adapting the metrics of these outcome measurements will be equally important as the alteration of the natural history in developing new therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.