Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32048181›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2020

Scene memory and spatial inhibition in visual search : A neural dynamic process model and new experimental evidence.

Raul Grieben, Jan Tekülve, Stephan K U Zibner, Jonas Lins, Sebastian Schneegans, Gregor Schöner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Dynamic Field Theory of Executive Function: Identifying Early Neurocognitive Markers.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Raul GriebenInstitut für Neuroinformatik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, 44780, Bochum, Germany. raul.grieben@ini.rub.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1718-7679
Jan TekülveInstitut für Neuroinformatik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, 44780, Bochum, Germany.
Stephan K U ZibnerInstitut für Neuroinformatik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, 44780, Bochum, Germany.
Jonas LinsInstitut für Neuroinformatik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, 44780, Bochum, Germany.
Sebastian SchneegansDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.
Gregor SchönerInstitut für Neuroinformatik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, 44780, Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Any object-oriented action requires that the object be first brought into the attentional foreground, often through visual search. Outside the laboratory, this would always take place in the presence of a scene representation acquired from ongoing visual exploration. The interaction of scene memory with visual search is still not completely understood. Feature integration theory (FIT) has shaped both research on visual search, emphasizing the scaling of search times with set size when searches entail feature conjunctions, and research on visual working memory through the change detection paradigm. Despite its neural motivation, there is no consistently neural process account of FIT in both its dimensions. We propose such an account that integrates (1) visual exploration and the building of scene memory, (2) the attentional detection of visual transients and the extraction of search cues, and (3) visual search itself. The model uses dynamic field theory in which networks of neural dynamic populations supporting stable activation states are coupled to generate sequences of processing steps. The neural architecture accounts for basic findings in visual search and proposes a concrete mechanism for the integration of working memory into the search process. In a behavioral experiment, we address the long-standing question of whether both the overall speed and the efficiency of visual search can be improved by scene memory. We find both effects and provide model fits of the behavioral results. In a second experiment, we show that the increase in efficiency is fragile, and trace that fragility to the resetting of spatial working memory.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultAttentionCuesFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermModels, NeurologicalPhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionYoung AdultNeural network modelingVisual searchVisual working memory

Identifiers

PMID32048181
PMCPMC7246253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.