Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32048125›Full record

ReviewThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2020

Comprehensive review of pericardial diseases using different imaging modalities.

Shaimaa A Fadl, Ayesha Nasrullah, Andrew Harris, Rachael Edwards, Gregory Kicska

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cardiac tamponade.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Cross-sectional imaging findings of cardiac outpouchings.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2023
    Review
  12. Severely Calcified Pericardium Causing Constrictive Pericarditis.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shaimaa A FadlDepartment of Radiology, Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) Health System, Richmond, VA, USA. shaimaa.hassib@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9553-7641
Ayesha NasrullahDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Andrew HarrisDepartment of Cardiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Rachael EdwardsTRA Medical Imaging and University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Gregory KicskaDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington Medical Center · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pericardial abnormalities are common cardiovascular disease entity, which are encountered in various clinical settings. Imaging plays an integral role in evaluation of pericardial abnormalities. The appropriate use of multiple imaging modalities is crucial to initiate the diagnosis and guide the referring providers to establish a management plan. Echocardiography (echo) is the initial imaging modality of choice. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are complementary imaging tools with better tissue characterization. Pericardial abnormalities include pericardial effusion, pericarditis, pericardial constriction, tamponade, pneumopericardium, pericardial rupture, fistulas, congenital abnormalities, and pericardial tumors. Pericardial effusion is a common clinical entity, where there is accumulation of fluid in the pericardial sac. Pericarditis can be acute, incessant, chronic, or recurrent. Pericardial thickening or enhancement are the main CT findings in acute pericarditis. Pericardial constriction results into diastolic heart failure. Differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy is important, since these conditions can present with similar clinical and hemodynamic findings and both have different management. Right atrial or right ventricular compression by the pericardial sac contents should raise the suspicion for tamponade. Immediate pericardiocentesis to release the elevated intra-pericardial pressure can be lifesaving. Pericardial rupture is a serious condition that can occur after trauma and can lead to cardiac herniation. The main purpose of this article is to do a comprehensive review of the imaging appearance of pericardial diseases on different imaging modalities and establish a structured diagnostic approach for pericardial diseases to appropriately guide management.

Indexed as

Multimodal ImagingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCardiac TamponadeEchocardiographyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPericardial EffusionPericarditisPericarditis, ConstrictivePericardiumPneumopericardiumConstrictive pericarditisHemopericardiumPericardial fistulaPericardial tamponadePericarditisPneumopericardium

Identifiers

PMID32048125
OpenAlexW3006381963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.