Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32048103›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2021

Accurate end systole detection in dicrotic notch-less arterial pressure waveforms.

Joel Balmer, Rachel Smith, Christopher G Pretty, Thomas Desaive, Geoff M Shaw, J Geoffrey Chase

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A signal processing tool for extracting features from arterial blood pressure and photoplethysmography waveforms.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Physiowise: A Physics-aware Approach to Dicrotic Notch Identification.ACM transactions on computing for healthcare · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joel BalmerDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. joel.balmer@pg.canterbury.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7945-8502
Rachel SmithDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Christopher G PrettyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Thomas DesaiveGIGA Cardiovascular Science, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Geoff M ShawDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
J Geoffrey ChaseDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
University of Canterbury · NZUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

Ministry of Business and Innovation National Science Challenge IEA-2015-GB01Royal Society of New Zealand Cook Fellowship JCFUOC1501Tertiary Education Commission 3505716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of end systole is often necessary when studying events specific to systole or diastole, for example, models that estimate cardiac function and systolic time intervals like left ventricular ejection duration. In proximal arterial pressure waveforms, such as from the aorta, the dicrotic notch marks this transition from systole to diastole. However, distal arterial pressure measures are more common in a clinical setting, typically containing no dicrotic notch. This study defines a new end systole detection algorithm, for dicrotic notch-less arterial waveforms. The new algorithm utilises the beta distribution probability density function as a weighting function, which is adaptive based on previous heartbeats end systole locations. Its accuracy is compared with an existing end systole estimation method, on dicrotic notch-less distal pressure waveforms. Because there are no dicrotic notches defining end systole, validating which method performed better is more difficult. Thus, a validation method is developed using dicrotic notch locations from simultaneously measured aortic pressure, forward projected by pulse transit time (PTT) to the more distal pressure signal. Systolic durations, estimated by each of the end systole estimates, are then compared to the validation systolic duration provided by the PTT based end systole point. Data comes from ten pigs, across two protocols testing the algorithms under different hemodynamic states. The resulting mean difference ± limits of agreement between measured and estimated systolic duration, of [Formula: see text] versus [Formula: see text], for the new and existing algorithms respectively, indicate the new algorithms superiority.

Indexed as

Arterial PressureArteriesAnimalsBlood PressureHemodynamicsPulse Wave AnalysisSwineSystoleCardiovascular systemDicrotic notchEnd systolePressure contour interpretationStart diastole

Identifiers

PMID32048103
OpenAlexW3006204555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.