ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2020
Cellular Immunotherapy in Lymphoma: Beyond CART Cells.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- MYBL2 is a Novel Independent Prognostic Biomarker and Correlated with Immune Infiltrates in Prostate Cancer.International journal of general medicine · 2022Article
- The identification of gene signatures in patients with extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma from a pair of twins.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation in Lymphomas-Expectations and Pitfalls.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
opinion statementCellular immunotherapy has been rapidly evolving and increasingly utilized in the management of relapsed and refractory lymphoma. CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CARTs) have achieved impressive results in pivotal clinical trials. Although CART development continues, these products have fundamental limitations that may make them less desirable in particular settings. For example, CARTs can only target cell surface antigens and thus are incapable of targeting intracellular tumor-associated proteins. In contrast to CARTs, conventional T cell receptors (TCR) allow T cells to target any cellular antigen, including intracellular proteins, since they interact with peptides presented by MHC I and II molecules. T cells recognizing EBV antigens through native TCRs have been successfully employed for treatment and prophylaxis of EBV-associated lymphomas, including post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Currently, transgenic TCR-transduced T cells targeting nonviral tumor antigens remain experimental but, if successful, could become an invaluable cellular therapy option. Because the manufacturing process of autologous T cell products, including CARTs and other tumor-specific T cells, takes several weeks, patients often need bridging therapy to maintain disease control, which may be challenging. Novel cellular platforms, such as genetically modified NK and NKT cells, may be amenable to allogeneic use and thus may allow production as a readily available, "off-the-shelf" product. As cellular therapies beyond CART continue to grow, available therapeutic options for relapsed and refractory lymphoma patients are expected to expand further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.