ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2020
[Use of sedating medication and physical restraints for patients with dementia in acute care hospitals : A non-randomized case control study].
Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints of older people in general hospital settings.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- Choosing informative priors in Bayesian regression models: a simulation study and tutorial using Stan and R.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe majority of acute care hospitals are not prepared for people with dementia with acute diseases in need of treatment. This results in an increased likelihood of the personnel being overtaxed. Dementia is the most frequent reason that hospital personnel administer sedating medication and use restraining measures.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate factors that influence the (inappropriate) use of sedating medication and physical restraints for patients with dementia in acute care hospitals.
methodsA non-randomized case control study, including two internal medicine wards was conducted in Hamburg, Germany. In the intervention group a special care concept was implemented focussing on patients with dementia, while the control group received regular care without a special dementia care concept. Logistic regression models were conducted to investigate associations between factors, such as age, severity of dementia, conspicuous behavior, Barthel index and type of treatment and the use of sedating medication and physical restraint measures.
resultsChallenging behavior (odds ratio, OR = 1.32) and treatment in the control group (OR=1.94) were significantly associated with the use of sedating medication. A low Barthel index, longer periods of hospitalization and treatment in the control group were significantly associated with a higher probability of the implementation of physical restraining measures. DISCUSSION: The use of sedating medication as well as physical restraining measures varied greatly between the intervention and control groups. This is in line with other studies that came to similar results and suggests that multiple components of special care concepts can explain these differences. These include architectonic design and spatial aspects as well as dementia-specific training of employees and an appropriate personnel complement. Such interventions can also reduce agitation and behavioral problems of patients. The avoidance of sedation and restraining measures is also positively associated with an increase in the quality of life of patients with dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.