Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32047941›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2020

Bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: an expert statement.

Jean-François Timsit, Etienne Ruppé, François Barbier, Alexis Tabah, Matteo Bassetti

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06166641 (Prediction Models for Risk Score and Prognosis of Intraoperatively Acquired Pressure Injury in Surgical Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 273 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
273citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
28.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06166641 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Prediction Models for Risk Score and Prognosis of Intraoperatively Acquired Pressure Injury in Surgical Patients: a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorAffiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled5,658ConditionsPressure Ulcer, Predictive Models, Surgical Patient, Clinical OutcomeArmsSurgical procedure at operating room
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

273 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 435 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

213 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jean-François TimsitAP-HP, Hôpital Bichat, Medical and Infectious Diseases ICU, 75018, Paris, France. jean-francois.timsit@aphp.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-6063-7383
Etienne RuppéUniversité de Paris, IAME, INSERM, 75018, Paris, France.
François BarbierMedical ICU, La Source Hospital, CHR Orléans, Orléans, France.
Alexis TabahICU, Redcliffe Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Matteo BassettiInfectious Diseases Clinic, Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa and Hospital Policlinico San Martino-IRCCS, Genoa, Italy.
Inserm · FRCentre hospitalier universitaire d'Orléans · FROspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bloodstream infection (BSI) is defined by positive blood cultures in a patient with systemic signs of infection and may be either secondary to a documented source or primary-that is, without identified origin. Community-acquired BSIs in immunocompetent adults usually involve drug-susceptible bacteria, while healthcare-associated BSIs are frequently due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains. Early adequate antimicrobial therapy is a key to improve patient outcomes, especially in those with criteria for sepsis or septic shock, and should be based on guidelines and direct examination of available samples. Local epidemiology, suspected source, immune status, previous antimicrobial exposure, and documented colonization with MDR bacteria must be considered for the choice of first-line antimicrobials in healthcare-associated and hospital-acquired BSIs. Early genotypic or phenotypic tests are now available for bacterial identification and early detection of resistance mechanisms and may help, though their clinical impact warrants further investigations. Initial antimicrobial dosing should take into account the pharmacokinetic alterations commonly observed in ICU patients, with a loading dose in case of sepsis or septic shock. Initial antimicrobial combination attempting to increase the antimicrobial spectrum should be discussed when MDR bacteria are suspected and/or in the most severely ill patients. Source identification and control should be performed as soon as the hemodynamic status is stabilized. De-escalation from a broad-spectrum to a narrow-spectrum antimicrobial may reduce antibiotic selection pressure without negative impact on mortality. The duration of therapy is usually 5-8 days though longer durations may be discussed depending on the underlying illness and the source of infection. This narrative review covers the epidemiology, diagnostic workflow and therapeutic aspects of BSI in ICU patients and proposed up-to-date expert statements.

Indexed as

PrevalenceAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaBlood CultureCritical IllnessDrug MonitoringExpert TestimonyHumansIntensive Care UnitsTime FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibioticAntibiotic stewardshipBloodstream infectionsCritically illDuration of therapyEpidemiologyMultidrug-resistant pathogensRapid diagnosisSepsisSource control

Identifiers

PMID32047941
PMCPMC7223992
OpenAlexW3005700774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.