Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32047922›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2020

Association analysis of loci implied in "buffering" epistasis.

Antonio Reverter, Zulma G Vitezica, Marina Naval-Sánchez, John Henshall, Fernanda S S Raidan, Yutao Li, Karin Meyer, Nicholas J Hudson, Laercio R Porto-Neto, Andrés Legarra

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonio ReverterCSIRO Agriculture & Food, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Zulma G VitezicaINRA/INPT, UMR 1388 GenPhySE, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Marina Naval-SánchezCSIRO Agriculture & Food, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
John HenshallCobb-Vantress Inc., Siloam Springs, AR.
Fernanda S S RaidanCSIRO Agriculture & Food, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Yutao LiCSIRO Agriculture & Food, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Karin MeyerAnimal Genetics and Breeding Unit, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.
Nicholas J HudsonSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia.
Laercio R Porto-NetoCSIRO Agriculture & Food, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Andrés LegarraINRA/INPT, UMR 1388 GenPhySE, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Agriculture and Food · AUCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUGénétique Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage · FRInstitut National Polytechnique de Toulouse · FRThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of New England · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The existence of buffering mechanisms is an emerging property of biological networks, and this results in the buildup of robustness through evolution. So far, there are no explicit methods to find loci implied in buffering mechanisms. However, buffering can be seen as interaction with genetic background. Here we develop this idea into a tractable model for quantitative genetics, in which the buffering effect of one locus with many other loci is condensed into a single statistical effect, multiplicative on the total additive genetic effect. This allows easier interpretation of the results and simplifies the problem of detecting epistasis from quadratic to linear in the number of loci. Using this formulation, we construct a linear model for genome-wide association studies that estimates and declares the significance of multiplicative epistatic effects at single loci. The model has the form of a variance components, norm reaction model and likelihood ratio tests are used for significance. This model is a generalization and explanation of previous ones. We test our model using bovine data: Brahman and Tropical Composite animals, phenotyped for body weight at yearling and genotyped at high density. After association analysis, we find a number of loci with buffering action in one, the other, or both breeds; these loci do not have a significant statistical additive effect. Most of these loci have been reported in previous studies, either with an additive effect or as footprints of selection. We identify buffering epistatic SNPs present in or near genes reported in the context of signatures of selection in multi-breed cattle population studies. Prominent among these genes are those associated with fertility (INHBA, TSHR, ESRRG, PRLR, and PPARG), growth (MSTN, GHR), coat characteristics (KIT, MITF, PRLR), and heat resistance (HSPA6 and HSPA1A). In these populations, we found loci that have a nonsignificant statistical additive effect but a significant epistatic effect. We argue that the discovery and study of loci associated with buffering effects allow attacking the difficult problems, among others, of the release of maintenance variance in artificial and natural selection, of quick adaptation to the environment, and of opposite signs of marker effects in different backgrounds. We conclude that our method and our results generate promising new perspectives for research in evolutionary and quantitative genetics based on the study of loci that buffer effect of other loci.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticAnimalsBody WeightBreedingCattleFemaleFertilityGenetic LociGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeMaleModels, GeneticPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideSelection, Geneticbeef cattleepistasisGWASselection

Identifiers

PMID32047922
PMCPMC7067535
OpenAlexW3005918576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.