Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32047891›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2021

Network analyses in microbiome based on high-throughput multi-omics data.

Zhaoqian Liu, Anjun Ma, Ewy Mathé, Marlena Merling, Qin Ma, Bingqiang Liu

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Therapeutic and diagnostic applications of exosomes in colorectal cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhaoqian LiuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Anjun MaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Ewy MathéDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Marlena MerlingDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Qin MaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Bingqiang LiuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

The OSU Center for Clinical and Translational Science: Advancing Today's Discoveries to Improve HealthUL1TR002733 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RINGEL, MATTHEW D · 2018 to 2022
$28.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002733
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Together with various hosts and environments, ubiquitous microbes interact closely with each other forming an intertwined system or community. Of interest, shifts of the relationships between microbes and their hosts or environments are associated with critical diseases and ecological changes. While advances in high-throughput Omics technologies offer a great opportunity for understanding the structures and functions of microbiome, it is still challenging to analyse and interpret the omics data. Specifically, the heterogeneity and diversity of microbial communities, compounded with the large size of the datasets, impose a tremendous challenge to mechanistically elucidate the complex communities. Fortunately, network analyses provide an efficient way to tackle this problem, and several network approaches have been proposed to improve this understanding recently. Here, we systemically illustrate these network theories that have been used in biological and biomedical research. Then, we review existing network modelling methods of microbial studies at multiple layers from metagenomics to metabolomics and further to multi-omics. Lastly, we discuss the limitations of present studies and provide a perspective for further directions in support of the understanding of microbial communities.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaTranscriptomeHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansMetabolomicsMetagenomicsProteomicsco-occurrenceintegrated analysismicrobiomemulti-omicsnetwork analysis

Identifiers

PMID32047891
PMCPMC7986608
OpenAlexW3006380141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.