Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32047766›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2019

The effect of biofeedback training on intestinal function among patients with middle and low rectal cancer: a randomized controlled study.

Li Liu, Xiaodan Wu, Qianwen Liu, Caixing Tang, Baojia Luo, Yujing Fang, Zhizhong Pan, Desen Wan, Meichun Zheng

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Li LiuSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Xiaodan WuSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Qianwen LiuSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Caixing TangSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Baojia LuoSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Yujing FangSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Zhizhong PanSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Desen WanSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Meichun ZhengSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the effect of biofeedback on intestinal function among patients with middle and low rectal cancer.

methodsUsing a randomized controlled trial design, 109 patients with middle and low rectal cancer indicated to have preoperative radiochemotherapy, anterior resection of the rectum, and preventive stoma were randomly divided into three groups: the blank control group, the pelvic floor muscle exercise group, and the biofeedback training group. A 16-month intervention and longitudinal follow-up study was conducted, and a questionnaire on intestinal function by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) was adopted into a Chinese version to evaluate patients' intestinal function situation.

resultsThe intestinal function of the biofeedback training group was better than the blank control group and pelvic floor muscle exercise group. The total score of intestinal function and the scores of each dimension were statistically significant (P<0.05).

conclusionsBiofeedback training could significantly improve the intestinal function of patients with middle and low rectal cancer, promote its recovery, and is thus worthy of clinical application.

Indexed as

Biofeedbackileostomyintestinal functionrectal neoplasmssphincter preservation operation (SPO)

Identifiers

PMID32047766
PMCPMC7011590
OpenAlexW2966691801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.