ReviewF1000Research2020
Objective Pain Assessment: a Key for the Management of Chronic Pain.
Review in F1000Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Efficacy of Fat Grafting on Treating Post-Mastectomy Pain with and without Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- Article
- Validation of the integral of pain relief as a measure of chronic pain treatment efficacy.Pain reports · 2026Article
- Pain assessment using physiological responses/markers in different types of pain: a scoping review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- The Role of Biomarkers in Acute Pain: A Narrative Review.Pain and therapy · 2025Review
- Psychedelics for Cancer Pain and Associated Psychological Distress: A Narrative Review of a Potential Strategy.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- A Novel Framework for Quantum-Enhanced Federated Learning with Edge Computing for Advanced Pain Assessment Using ECG Signals via Continuous Wavelet Transform Images.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Postoperative multimodal pain management: a narrative review of current practices, clinical and educational gaps, and future directions.Frontiers in anesthesiology · 2025Article
- Nociception level index as a tool of measuring pain objectively in patients with complex regional pain syndrome: a feasibility study.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Right Hemispheric Neuronal Dysfunction in Cancer Pain: A Resting-State fMRI Exploratory Study.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Evaluating low back pain through electrodermal activity: a systematic review protocol.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Psychophysical and Functional Outcomes in Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy After Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Narrative Review and Case Series.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2024Review
- Article
- Advancements in Understanding and Classifying Chronic Orofacial Pain: Key Insights from Biopsychosocial Models and International Classifications (ICHD-3, ICD-11, ICOP).Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Review
- Pain Assessment in Oral Medicine through Its Different Dimensions: A Comprehensive Review.Dentistry journal · 2023Review
- Article
- A systematic review of neurophysiological sensing for the assessment of acute pain.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Review
- External validation of binary machine learning models for pain intensity perception classification from EEG in healthy individuals.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The individual and social burdens associated with chronic pain have been escalating globally. Accurate pain measurement facilitates early diagnosis, disease progression monitoring and therapeutic efficacy evaluation, thus is a key for the management of chronic pain. Although the "golden standards" of pain measurement are self-reported scales in clinical practice, the reliability of these subjective methods could be easily affected by patients' physiological and psychological status, as well as the assessors' predispositions. Therefore, objective pain assessment has attracted substantial attention recently. Previous studies of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) revealed that certain cortices and subcortical areas are commonly activated in subjects suffering from pain. Dynamic pain connectome analysis also found various alterations of neural network connectivity that are correlated with the severity of clinical pain symptoms. Electroencephalograph (EEG) demonstrated suppressed spontaneous oscillations during pain experience. Spectral power and coherence analysis of EEG also identified signatures of different types of chronic pain. Furthermore, fMRI and EEG can visualize objective brain activities modulated by analgesics in a mechanism-based way, thus bridge the gaps between animal studies and clinical trials. Using fMRI and EEG, researchers are able to predict therapeutic efficacy and identify personalized optimal first-line regimens. In the future, the emergence of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and cell labelling in MRI would encourage the investigation on metabolic and cellular pain biomarkers. The incorporation of machine learning algorithms with neuroimaging or behavior analysis could further enhance the specificity and accuracy of objective pain assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.