Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32047512›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2019

Genomic Diversity Evaluation of

Anthony Piot, Julien Prunier, Nathalie Isabel, Jaroslav Klápště, Yousry A El-Kassaby, Juan Carlos Villarreal Aguilar, Ilga Porth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anthony PiotDepartment of Wood and Forest Sciences, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Julien PrunierDepartment of Wood and Forest Sciences, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Nathalie IsabelNatural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Jaroslav KlápštěScion, Rotorua, New Zealand.
Yousry A El-KassabyDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Juan Carlos Villarreal AguilarCentre for Forest Research, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Ilga PorthDepartment of Wood and Forest Sciences, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies are powerful tools to elucidate the genome-to-phenome relationship. In order to explain most of the observed heritability of a phenotypic trait, a sufficient number of individuals and a large set of genetic variants must be examined. The development of high-throughput technologies and cost-efficient resequencing of complete genomes have enabled the genome-wide identification of genetic variation at large scale. As such, almost all existing genetic variation becomes available, and it is now possible to identify rare genetic variants in a population sample. Rare genetic variants that were usually filtered out in most genetic association studies are the most numerous genetic variations across genomes and hold great potential to explain a significant part of the missing heritability observed in association studies. Rare genetic variants must be identified with high confidence, as they can easily be confounded with sequencing errors. In this study, we used a pre-filtered data set of 1,014 pure

Indexed as

annotationgenesgenetic architecturemissing heritabilityrare defective allelessmall genetic variantsvariant calling comparisons

Identifiers

PMID32047512
PMCPMC6997551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.