Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32047479›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2020

Is Embryo Cryopreservation Causing Macrosomia-and What Else?

Raoul Orvieto, Michal Kirshenbaum, Norbert Gleicher

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Freeze all for all- is it justified?Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2025
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Maternal and neonatal outcomes followingExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Number of embryos transferred and diagnosis of preeclampsia.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Raoul OrvietoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Michal KirshenbaumDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Norbert GleicherThe Center for Human Reproduction, New York, NY, United States.
Sheba Medical Center · ILFoundation for Reproductive Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of embryos transferred during an IVF cycle is directly related to the high incidence of multiple births, which is the culprit of perinatal morbidity. Therefore, single fresh embryo transfer (ET) strategy, or freeze-all, followed by a single frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycle, may dramatically reduce the rate of multiple births, without compromising the cumulative live birth rates (LBRs). A literature review was conducted for all available evidences assessing obstetrics and perinatal outcomes associated with FET compared to fresh ET and natural conception. While studies comparing fresh and FET cycles in normal responders have yielded conflicting results for pregnancy rate, FET was associated with lower risk of prematurity and low birth weight and increased risk of large for gestational age (LGA) and/or macrosomic in singletons, when compared with fresh ET. Macrosomic/LGA births have a higher risk of fetal hypoxia, stillbirth, shoulder dystocia, perineal lacerations, cesarean section, postpartum hemorrhage and neonatal metabolic disturbances at birth. Nonetheless, it seems that other than higher risk of fetal macrosomia, there are additional obstetric complications associated with FET. The relative risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, as well as perinatal mortality were also demonstrated to be increased in FET compared with singletons from fresh ET and natural conception. Therefore, when considering elective freeze-all policy, in addition to LBR and the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, physicians should consider the aforementioned increased FET cycles' pregnancy complications, including LGA/ macrosomia, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, as well as perinatal mortality.

Indexed as

Embryo, MammalianBirth WeightCryopreservationFemaleFertilization in VitroFetal MacrosomiaFreezingHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesPerinatal MortalityPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy RateRisk FactorsSingle Embryo Transfercryopreservationfrozen-thawed embryo transferIVFmacrosomiapregnancy complications

Identifiers

PMID32047479
PMCPMC6997460
OpenAlexW3001948772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.