ArticleFocus (American Psychiatric Publishing)2019
Clinician Liability in Prescribing Antidepressants.
Article in Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Malpractice Claims and Ethical Issues in Prison Health Care Related to Consent and Confidentiality.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Acupuncture Ameliorates Depressive Behaviors by Modulating the Expression of Hippocampal Iba-1 and HMGB1 in Rats Exposed to Chronic Restraint Stress.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- On the same team: A call for increased medicolegal knowledge exchanges between forensic psychiatry and sports psychiatry.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malpractice claims frequently focus on the clinician's prescription of medications. Claims may arise in many environments: inpatient units, outpatient offices, prisons, journal articles, pharmaceutical talks, and clinical trials of new medications. The basis of the claim may be product liability, informed consent, deliberate indifference, violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or academic malpractice. All malpractice claims include a duty, a breach of duty, causation, and damages. The duty and breach of duty may be obvious, but causation can vary considerably in malpractice claims. Perhaps the damages are most apparent when the patient has suffered side effects. This article explores clinician liability for the use of antidepressants from the clinical trial to the removal from the market.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.