Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32047380›Full record

ArticleFocus (American Psychiatric Publishing)2019

Liability and Patient Suicide.

Debra A Pinals

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Alcohol as a Foreseeable Suicide Risk Amplifier.Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2026
    Article
  2. Suicide risk and malpractice considerations in geriatric care.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Legal Considerations in Emergency Psychiatry.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Debra A PinalsProgram in Psychiatry, Law, and Ethics, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
University of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suicide is one of the leading causes of liability against a psychiatrist treating adult patients. Reducing the risk of liability entails understanding the phenomenology of suicide, approaching suicide risk assessment from a clinical perspective, conceptualizing how malpractice cases unfold, examining the issues of foreseeability and proper risk assessment, and developing a risk management approach to mitigate against the potential for a bad outcome. The use of various suicide screening risk assessments in certain clinical contexts is a potentially useful first step in identifying the need for further risk assessment. In conducting a more detailed review of a patient's risk, nonsuicidal self-injury is typically distinguished from suicidal intent and action, although morbidity and mortality can also be associated with any deliberate self-injury. Understanding the concepts of means reduction and risk management planning are essential elements to assist in helping reduce risk. Special attention to risk reduction related to firearms has received increased attention in recent years. Proper assessment, and documentation thereof in clinical records can assist in reducing liability. This article reviews these basic elements for the general practitioner of adult psychiatry related to suicide risk, assessment, and liability surrounding patient suicide.

Indexed as

liabilitymalpracticeriskrisk assessmentsafety planSuicide

Identifiers

PMID32047380
PMCPMC7011301
OpenAlexW2989474200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.