ReviewFocus (American Psychiatric Publishing)2019
Psychopharmacological Decision Making in Bipolar Disorder During Pregnancy and Lactation: A Case-by-Case Approach to Using Current Evidence.
Review in Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dopamine Partial Agonists in Pregnancy and Lactation: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Psychotropic prescribing patterns during pregnancy in two South African mental health clinics.Journal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa · 2025Article
- Advances in Psychotropic Treatment for Pregnant Women: Efficacy, Adverse Outcomes, and Therapeutic Monitoring.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Evaluating the Efficacy of ChatGPT in Navigating the Spanish Medical Residency Entrance Examination (MIR): Promising Horizons for AI in Clinical Medicine.Clinics and practice · 2023Article
- Personalized Pharmacotherapy for Bipolar Disorder: How to Tailor Findings From Randomized Trials to Individual Patient-Level Outcomes.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The safety of pharmacotherapy for bipolar disorder during pregnancy and lactation remains a subject of debate and uncertainty. Clinicians must balance concerns about anatomical and behavioral teratogenicity, maternal mental health, exposure to multiple drugs, and heightened risks for peripartum mood episodes. Risk-benefit analyses must consider factors such as illness severity, past pregnancy treatment outcomes, known drug responsivity, psychosocial supports, and key windows during fetal development. Pharmacological decision making usually changes over the course of pregnancy, given developments in maternal physiology and critical relapse risk periods. Among mood stabilizers, given current research, many experts eschew divalproex and carbamazepine, consider lamotrigine relatively benign, and voice strong opinions for or against lithium. Most second-generation antipsychotics are considered relatively safe, apart from possible extrapyramidal and other motor signs of withdrawal after delivery. In this review, the authors analyze the practical questions, current controversies, and available evidence regarding psychotropic drug therapy during pregnancy and lactation in bipolar disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.