ReviewSeminars in hearing2020
Emerging Technologies, Market Segments, and MarkeTrak 10 Insights in Hearing Health Technology.
Review in Seminars in hearing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Speech Perception in Noise: A Narrative Review of Cognitive Contribution and Hearing-Aid Signal Processing.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Review
- Facilitators and Barriers to Over-the-Counter Hearing Aid Use in People With Dementia: Semistructured Interview Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Reduced listening effort with adaptive binaural beamforming in realistic noisy environments.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Association of Self-Recognition of Hearing Loss With Hospitalizations in Older Adults in the United States.Medical care · 2025Article
- Sound Advice: A Consumer's Perspective on Navigating the World of Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids.Seminars in hearing · 2025Review
- Amplitude Modulation Perception and Cortical Evoked Potentials in Children With Listening Difficulties and Their Typically Developing Peers.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024Article
- Barriers to Hearing Health Care for Aging Adults: Reframing the Conversation.Innovation in aging · 2024Article
- Auditory, Lexical, and Multitasking Demands Interactively Impact Listening Effort.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Article
- Effect of Determinants of Health on the Hearing Care Framework: An Economic Perspective.Seminars in hearing · 2023Review
- Centering on People: How Hearing Care Professionals Can Adapt to Consumers' Need and Outcomes.Seminars in hearing · 2023Review
- Exploring Hearing Care Technology from Clinic to Capability.Seminars in hearing · 2023Review
- Scoping Review for a Global Hearing Care Framework: Matching Theory with Practice.Seminars in hearing · 2023Article
- Behavior Change in Chronic Health: Reviewing What We Know, What Is Happening, and What Is Next for Hearing Loss.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Evaluating and optimizing hearing-aid self-fitting methods using population coverage.Frontiers in audiology and otology · 2023Article
- Speech cortical activation and connectivity in typically developing children and those with listening difficulties.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2022Article
- The hunt for hidden hearing loss in humans: From preclinical studies to effective interventions.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
- Perception and expectations of personal sound amplification products in Korea: A hospital-based, multi-center, cross-sectional survey.PloS one · 2022Article
- A Comparison of the Perceived Hearing Difficulties of Community and Clinical Samples of Older Adults.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021Article
- Toward a New Evidence-Based Fitting Paradigm for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids.American journal of audiology · 2021Article
- Common Configurations of Real-Ear Aided Response Targets Prescribed by NAL-NL2 for Older Adults With Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.American journal of audiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hearing health care is rapidly changing through innovation in technology, services, business models, and product categories. The introduction of hearables and over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids in particular will change the market for hearing help and the role of the hearing care professionals (HCPs). This article focuses on how these products will be differentiated from HCP-fit hearing aids through their ability to address the unmet needs of different consumer segments within the population of people with hearing dysfunction. The unmet hearing needs of each segment are discussed, and the size of each segment estimated, demonstrating a large potential market for hearables and a smaller potential market for hearing aids than has been previously mentioned in the literature. The results from MarkeTrak 10's survey of consumers' attitudes toward an OTC model are reviewed, showing that approximately half of both hearing aid owners and nonowners are uncomfortable doing hearing- and hearing aid-related tasks on their own without the assistance of an HCP and would be unlikely to purchase OTC hearing aids if available today. MarkeTrak data are also shown that demonstrate that the majority of hearing aid and personal sound amplification product owners believe that the HCP helped or would have helped with their hearing devices. Finally, challenges to OTC hearing aids becoming successful are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.