Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32047279›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2020

Disentangling the impact of environmental and phylogenetic constraints on prokaryotic within-species diversity.

Oleksandr M Maistrenko, Daniel R Mende, Mechthild Luetge, Falk Hildebrand, Thomas S B Schmidt, Simone S Li, João F Matias Rodrigues, Christian von Mering, Luis Pedro Coelho, Jaime Huerta-Cepas and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genomic and Pangenomic Insights intoPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Beyond H37Rv:Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Oleksandr M Maistrenko *European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Structural and Computational Biology Unit, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1961-7548
Daniel R Mende *European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Structural and Computational Biology Unit, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mechthild LuetgeEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Structural and Computational Biology Unit, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany.
Falk HildebrandEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Structural and Computational Biology Unit, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0078-8948
Thomas S B SchmidtEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Structural and Computational Biology Unit, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany.
Simone S LiEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Structural and Computational Biology Unit, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany.
João F Matias RodriguesDepartment of Molecular Life Sciences and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Zurich, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8413-9920
Christian von MeringDepartment of Molecular Life Sciences and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Zurich, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7734-9102
Luis Pedro CoelhoEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Structural and Computational Biology Unit, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jaime Huerta-CepasEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Structural and Computational Biology Unit, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany.
Shinichi SunagawaEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Structural and Computational Biology Unit, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3065-0314
Peer BorkEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Structural and Computational Biology Unit, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany. bork@embl.de.
European Molecular Biology Laboratory · DESIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLInstituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria · ESKantonsspital St. Gallen · CHMax Delbrück Center · DENovo Nordisk Foundation · DKQuadram Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/F/000PR10353Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/F/000PR10355European Research Council 669830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial organisms inhabit virtually all environments and encompass a vast biological diversity. The pangenome concept aims to facilitate an understanding of diversity within defined phylogenetic groups. Hence, pangenomes are increasingly used to characterize the strain diversity of prokaryotic species. To understand the interdependence of pangenome features (such as the number of core and accessory genes) and to study the impact of environmental and phylogenetic constraints on the evolution of conspecific strains, we computed pangenomes for 155 phylogenetically diverse species (from ten phyla) using 7,000 high-quality genomes to each of which the respective habitats were assigned. Species habitat ubiquity was associated with several pangenome features. In particular, core-genome size was more important for ubiquity than accessory genome size. In general, environmental preferences had a stronger impact on pangenome evolution than phylogenetic inertia. Environmental preferences explained up to 49% of the variance for pangenome features, compared with 18% by phylogenetic inertia. This observation was robust when the dataset was extended to 10,100 species (59 phyla). The importance of environmental preferences was further accentuated by convergent evolution of pangenome features in a given habitat type across different phylogenetic clades. For example, the soil environment promotes expansion of pangenome size, while host-associated habitats lead to its reduction. Taken together, we explored the global principles of pangenome evolution, quantified the influence of habitat, and phylogenetic inertia on the evolution of pangenomes and identified criteria governing species ubiquity and habitat specificity.

Indexed as

BiodiversityProkaryotic CellsEcosystemGenome SizePhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID32047279
PMCPMC7174425
OpenAlexW3005785227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.