ArticleSpinal cord2020
Exploring nutrition knowledge and dietary intake of adults with spinal cord injury in specialist rehabilitation.
Article in Spinal cord, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Foodservice Models and Nutrition Practices in Spinal Facilities: Insights and Opportunities for Improvement From a Pilot Multinational Survey.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025Article
- Expert-Reviewed Nutritional Guidance for Adults with Spinal Cord Injury: A Delphi Study.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Nutrition and eating beliefs and behaviors among individuals with spinal cord injuries and disorders: Healthy or misconceived?Rehabilitation psychology · 2025Article
- Nutritional alterations, adverse consequences, and comprehensive assessment in spinal cord injury: a review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- The Effect of Sociodemographic and Anthropometric Variables on Nutritional Knowledge and Nutrition Literacy.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Literature Review of Nutrition Knowledge Measurement Items Used in Persons Living with Spinal Cord Injuries and Disorders.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2024Review
- Nutrition Education to Reduce Metabolic Dysfunction for Spinal Cord Injury: A Module-Based Nutrition Education Guide for Healthcare Providers and Consumers.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Energy expenditure and nutrient intake after spinal cord injury: a comprehensive review and practical recommendations.The British journal of nutrition · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designCross-sectional study.
objectivesTo explore nutrition knowledge and dietary intake in adults with spinal cord injury (SCI).
settingSCI centre, Australia.
methodsA validated General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire-R (GNKQ-R) evaluated nutrition knowledge to explore correlations with dietary intake. Dietary intake (current and pre-hospitalisation) was compared with national dietary modelling tools and Nutrient Reference Values (NRV) for assessing nutritional adequacy.
resultsFifty participants, predominantly male (70%), with a median age of 50 years took part in the study. The mean GNKQ-R score was 59 (13.1)/85 (69%). Participants with a higher level of education scored higher (82%; p < 0.01). The GNKQ-R score was also positively associated with the level of education (r = 0.45; p = < 0.01) with a large effect size (>0.80 Cohen's d). Non-conformance with Australian Dietary Guidelines (ADG) and failure to meet NRV were also noted. Low calcium intakes were found in 69% (n = 34) and saturated fatty acid (SFA) consumption exceeded both the acceptable macronutrient distribution range (AMDR) of 10% for adults (n = 32, 65%) and the lower target of 7% recommended for at-risk groups (n = 49, 100%). Lower nutrition knowledge scores were negatively correlated with SFA intake (r = -0.28; p = 0.05, two-tailed) with a large Cohen's d effect size (>0.80).
conclusionsDiscordance with the ADG for most food groups was exemplified by high intake of SFA. Individuals with SCI have elevated cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Poor nutrition knowledge correlated with high SFA intake, indicates a need for timely, targeted interventions for CVD prevention in this patient group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.