Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32047239›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Return to work and clinical outcome after surgical treatment and conservative management of patients with intramedullary spinal cord ependymoma.

Bedjan Behmanesh, Florian Gessler, Sae-Yeon Won, Daniel Dubinski, Johanna Quick-Weller, Lioba Imoehl, Volker Seifert, Gerhard Marquardt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bedjan BehmaneshDepartment of Neurosurgery, Goethe- University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. bedjan.behmanesh@gmail.com.
Florian GesslerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Goethe- University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Sae-Yeon WonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Goethe- University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Daniel DubinskiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Goethe- University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Johanna Quick-WellerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Goethe- University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Lioba ImoehlDepartment of Neurosurgery, Goethe- University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Volker SeifertDepartment of Neurosurgery, Goethe- University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Gerhard MarquardtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Goethe- University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to return to work after treatment of diseases is an important issue. Aim of this study is to compare surgery and conservative management focusing on clinical outcome and ability to return to work in patients with intramedullary spinal cord ependymoma. Retrospective, single center study. The neurological status at first presentation, as well as in long-term follow-up, were assessed using the modified McCormick Disability Scale and modified Rankin Scale. The study population consisted of 56 patients, 23 (41%) were managed conservatively and 33 (59%) underwent microsurgical resection. The median age was 47.5 years in the conservative group and 44.5 in the surgical group. At first admission 18 of conservatively treated and 28 of surgically treated patients were employed, p = 0.7. At the last follow-up 15 (83%) of conservatively and 10 (36%) of surgically treated patients returned to work, p = 0.002. The median modified McCormick score in both groups (conservative vs. surgical) was at admission 1 vs. 1, p = 1.0 and at last follow up 1 vs. 2.5, p = 0.001. Patients clinical outcome in the surgical group was significantly reduced at last follow up as assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRs score of 0-2) at admission 100% vs. 100% and last follow-up 94% vs. 57%, p = 0.007. In our investigated study population, conservatively managed patients revealed a significantly better outcome and were more often able to return to work.

Indexed as

Recovery of FunctionAdultConservative TreatmentEpendymomaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurosurgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesReturn to WorkSpinal Cord NeoplasmsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32047239
PMCPMC7012826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.