ArticleScientific reports2020
Return to work and clinical outcome after surgical treatment and conservative management of patients with intramedullary spinal cord ependymoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictors of return to work after spinal surgery : systematic review and Meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes of Intramedullary Spinal Cord Ependymomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Spine surgery and related research · 2026Review
- Factors Determining Rehabilitation Needs After Intradural Spinal Tumor Surgery: A Prospective Study.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Return to Work Following Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Percutaneous Posterior Pedicle Fixation: A Retrospective Analysis from Two Academic Centers in Germany.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The Beneficial Effect of Preoperative Exercise on Postoperative Clinical Outcome, Quality of Life and Return to Work after Microsurgical Resection of Spinal Meningiomas.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Long-term quality of life and functional outcomes in adults surgically treated for intramedullary spinal cord tumor.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Article
- Quality of life and return to work and sports after spinal ependymoma resection.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of ependymomas in the upper cervical spinal cord: a single-center experience of 155 consecutive patients.Neurosurgical review · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to return to work after treatment of diseases is an important issue. Aim of this study is to compare surgery and conservative management focusing on clinical outcome and ability to return to work in patients with intramedullary spinal cord ependymoma. Retrospective, single center study. The neurological status at first presentation, as well as in long-term follow-up, were assessed using the modified McCormick Disability Scale and modified Rankin Scale. The study population consisted of 56 patients, 23 (41%) were managed conservatively and 33 (59%) underwent microsurgical resection. The median age was 47.5 years in the conservative group and 44.5 in the surgical group. At first admission 18 of conservatively treated and 28 of surgically treated patients were employed, p = 0.7. At the last follow-up 15 (83%) of conservatively and 10 (36%) of surgically treated patients returned to work, p = 0.002. The median modified McCormick score in both groups (conservative vs. surgical) was at admission 1 vs. 1, p = 1.0 and at last follow up 1 vs. 2.5, p = 0.001. Patients clinical outcome in the surgical group was significantly reduced at last follow up as assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRs score of 0-2) at admission 100% vs. 100% and last follow-up 94% vs. 57%, p = 0.007. In our investigated study population, conservatively managed patients revealed a significantly better outcome and were more often able to return to work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.