Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32047237›Full record

Trial reportLeukemia2020

ATIR101 administered after T-cell-depleted haploidentical HSCT reduces NRM and improves overall survival in acute leukemia.

Denis Claude Roy, Irwin Walker, Johan Maertens, Philippe Lewalle, Eduardo Olavarria, Dominik Selleslag, Sylvie Lachance, Marc Buyse, Kun Wang, Jeroen Rovers and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Leukemia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. "Attack!" Cellular Therapies to Attack Pathogens and Tumors.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. In 2022, which is preferred: haploidentical or cord transplant?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. T-Cell-Replete VersusFrontiers in pediatrics · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Denis Claude RoyBlood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada. denis-claude.roy@umontreal.ca.
Irwin WalkerJuravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Johan MaertensKU Leuven, Microbiology Immunology & Transplantation, Clinical Bacteriology and Mycology, and Department of Hematology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
Philippe LewalleLaboratory of Experimental Hematology, Jules Bordet Institut, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Eduardo OlavarriaCentre for Haematology, Imperial College London at Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
Dominik SelleslagAZ Sint Jan Brugge-Oostende, Brugge, Belgium.
Sylvie LachanceBlood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Marc BuyseInternational Drug Development Institute, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Kun WangInternational Drug Development Institute, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Jeroen RoversDC Prime, Leiden, Netherlands.
Irene SantiKiadis Pharma, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Halvard BonigInstitute for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohematology, Goethe University and German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Württemberg-Hesse, Frankfurt, Germany.
Andrew SandlerKiadis Pharma, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jurjen VelthuisKiadis Pharma, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Stephan MielkeDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Center of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg University Medical Center, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Kiadis Pharma (Netherlands) · NLInternational Drug Development Institute (Belgium) · BEUniversité de Montréal · CAAZ Sint-Jan · BEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEImperial College London · GBInstitut Jules Bordet · BEKarolinska University Hospital · SEKU Leuven · BEMcMaster University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overcoming graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) without increasing relapse and severe infections is a major challenge after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). ATIR101 is a haploidentical, naïve cell-enriched T-cell product, depleted of recipient-alloreactive T cells to minimize the risk of GvHD and provide graft-versus-infection and -leukemia activity. Safety and efficacy of ATIR101 administered after T-cell-depleted haploidentical HSCT (TCD-haplo + ATIR101) without posttransplant immunosuppressors were evaluated in a Phase 2, multicenter study of 23 patients with acute leukemia and compared with an observational cohort undergoing TCD-haplo alone (n = 35), matched unrelated donor (MUD; n = 64), mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD; n = 37), and umbilical cord blood (UCB; n = 22) HSCT. The primary endpoint, 6-month non-relapse mortality (NRM), was 13% with TCD-haplo + ATIR101. One year post HSCT, TCD-haplo + ATIR101 resulted in lower NRM versus TCD-haplo alone (P = 0.008). GvHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) was higher with TCD-haplo + ATIR101 versus MMUD and UCB (both P < 0.03; 1-year rates: 56.5%, 27.0%, and 22.7%, respectively) and was not statistically different from MUD (1 year: 40.6%). ATIR101 grafts with high third-party reactivity were associated with fewer clinically relevant viral infections. Results suggest that haploidentical, selective donor-cell depletion may eliminate requirements for posttransplant immunosuppressors without increasing GvHD risk, with similar GRFS to MUD. Following these results, a randomized Phase 3 trial versus posttransplant cyclophosphamide had been initiated.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGraft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteLymphocyte DepletionMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSurvival RateTransplantation ConditioningUnrelated DonorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32047237
PMCPMC7326707
OpenAlexW3005910409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.