Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32047155›Full record

Trial reportNature communications2020

First-in-human robotic supermicrosurgery using a dedicated microsurgical robot for treating breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized pilot trial.

Tom J M van Mulken, Rutger M Schols, Andrea M J Scharmga, Bjorn Winkens, Raimondo Cau, Ferry B F Schoenmakers, Shan S Qiu, René R W J van der Hulst, MicroSurgical Robot Research Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06532955 (Pilot Study on Robotic Assisted Microsurgical Lymphatico-venular Anastomosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 81 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06532955 naunknown statusnot on this map

Pilot Study on Robotic Assisted Microsurgical Lymphatico-venular Anastomosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorMaastricht University Medical CenterRan2017 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsLymphedema, Lymphedema Arm, Lymphedema of Upper Arm, Lymphedema of Upper LimbArmsLymphaticovenous anastomosis using Microsure Motion Stabilizer, Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (manual)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 186 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Lymphovenous Bypass: Past, Present, and Future.Archives of plastic surgery · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The first total robotic-assisted lymphovenous anastomosis: prospects for innovation and future development.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tom J M van MulkenDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rutger M ScholsDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands. rutger.schols@mumc.nl.
Andrea M J ScharmgaDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Bjorn WinkensDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Raimondo CauDepartment of Medical Robotic Technologies, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Ferry B F SchoenmakersDepartment of Medical Robotic Technologies, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Shan S QiuDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
René R W J van der HulstDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
MicroSurgical Robot Research Group
Maastricht University · NLEindhoven University of Technology · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in reconstructive microsurgery have evolved into supermicrosurgery; connecting vessels with diameter between 0.3 and 0.8 mm for reconstruction of lymphatic flow and vascularized tissue transplantation. Supermicrosurgery is limited by the precision and dexterity of the surgeon's hands. Robot assistance can help overcome these human limitations, thereby enabling a breakthrough in supermicrosurgery. We report the first-in-human study of robot-assisted supermicrosurgery using a dedicated microsurgical robotic platform. A prospective randomized pilot study is conducted comparing robot-assisted and manual supermicrosurgical lymphatico-venous anastomosis (LVA) in treating breast cancer-related lymphedema. We evaluate patient outcome at 1 and 3 months post surgery, duration of the surgery, and quality of the anastomosis. At 3 months, patient outcome improves. Furthermore, a steep decline in duration of time required to complete the anastomosis is observed in the robot-assisted group (33-16 min). Here, we report the feasibility of robot-assisted supermicrosurgical anastomosis in LVA, indicating promising results for the future of reconstructive supermicrosurgery.

Indexed as

AgedAnastomosis, SurgicalBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphedemaMicrosurgeryMiddle AgedNetherlandsPilot ProjectsPlastic Surgery ProceduresProspective StudiesRobotic Surgical Procedures

Identifiers

PMID32047155
PMCPMC7012819
OpenAlexW3005613386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.