Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32047013›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Proximal Femoral Nail Unlocked versus Locked (ProFNUL): a protocol for a multicentre, parallel-armed randomised controlled trial for the effect of femoral nail mode of lag screw locking and screw configuration in the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures.

Arjun Sivakumar, Dominic Thewlis, Andreas Ladurner, Suzanne Edwards, Mark Rickman

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Peri-implant fractures after Intramedullary fixation for femoral trochanteric fracture: a multicenter (TRON Group) study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  3. Gait biomechanics after proximal femoral nailing of intertrochanteric fractures.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A unique cause of Gamma 3 cut-out: A case report and literature review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arjun SivakumarCentre for Orthopaedic & Trauma Research (COTR), Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia arjun.sivakumar@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-7446-3679
Dominic ThewlisCentre for Orthopaedic & Trauma Research (COTR), Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Andreas LadurnerDepartment of Orthopaedics & Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Suzanne EdwardsAdelaide Health Technology Assessment, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Mark RickmanDepartment of Orthopaedics & Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntertrochanteric fractures are common fragility injuries in the elderly. Surgical fixation using intramedullary devices are one of the widely used management options. To date, evidence demonstrating the effects of lag screw configuration and the mode of lag screw locking in these devices is lacking. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the lag screw configuration (single vs integrated dual interlocking screw) and the mode of lag screw locking (static vs dynamic) of a femoral nail device result in differences in clinical and functional outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre, pragmatic, single-blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a three-arm parallel group design is proposed. Nine-hundred patients with intertrochanteric fractures (A1 and A2 AO/OTA) will be randomised to fracture treatment using a Gamma3 nail (Stryker; proximally dynamic) or a Trigen Intertan nail (Smith & Nephew) in a dynamic or static lag screw configuration. The primary outcome measure consists of radiological evidence of construct failure within 6 months following surgery, with failure being defined as breakage of the femoral nail or distal locking screw, a change in tip-apex distance of more than 10 mm or lag screw cut-out through the femoral head. Secondary outcomes include surgical data (operation time, fluoroscopy time), complications (surgical site infection, reoperation, patient death), return to mobility and home circumstances, functional independence, function and pain. Patients who are able to walk independently with or without a mobility aid and are able to answer simple questions and follow instructions will be asked to participate in three dimensional gait analysis at 6 weeks and 6 months to assess hip biomechanics from this cohort. Additional secondary measures of gait speed, hip range of motion, joint contact and muscle forces and gross activity monitoring patterns will be obtained in this subgroup. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Central Adelaide Local Health Network Human Research Ethics Committee has approved the protocol for this RCT (HREC/17/RAH/433). The results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and presentations at relevant conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12618001431213.

Indexed as

Bone NailsBone ScrewsFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryHip FracturesResearch DesignHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodTreatment Outcomeclinical trialsfracture fixationhipintramedullary nailingorthopaedic & trauma surgerytrauma management

Identifiers

PMID32047013
PMCPMC7044810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.