Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32047011›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Improving depression outcomes among Australian primary care patients: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Mariko Carey, Rob Sanson-Fisher, Nick Zwar, Danielle Mazza, Graham Meadows, Leon Piterman, Amy Waller, Justin Walsh, Christopher Oldmeadow, Simon Deeming and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mariko CareySchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia Mariko.Carey@newcastle.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-0549-1115
Rob Sanson-FisherSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Nick ZwarSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Danielle MazzaSchool of Primary and Allied Health Care, Department of General Practice, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia.
Graham MeadowsSouthern Synergy, Monash Health Adult Psychiatry Research, Training and Evaluation Centre, Dandenong, Victoria, Australia.
Leon PitermanSchool of Primary and Allied Health Care, Department of General Practice, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia.
Amy WallerSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Justin WalshSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Christopher OldmeadowHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.
Simon DeemingHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.
Andrew SearlesHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.
Frans HenskensSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Brian KellySchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute · AUMonash University · AUMonash Health · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDepression is a common and debilitating condition. In Australia, general practitioners (GPs) are the key providers of depression care. However, available evidence suggests that case finding for depression in primary care is poor. This study will examine whether a systematic approach to screening for depression and assessing patient preferences for depression care improves depression outcomes among primary care patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A cluster randomised controlled design will be used with general practice clinics randomly assigned to either the intervention (n=12) or usual care group (n=12). Patients who are aged 18 and older, presenting for general practice care, will be eligible to participate. Eighty-three participants will be recruited at each clinic. Participants will be asked to complete a baseline survey administered on a touch screen computer at their GP clinic, and then a follow-up survey at 3, 6 and 12 months. Those attending usual care practices will receive standard care. GPs at intervention practices will complete an online Clinical e-Audit, and will be provided with provider and patient-directed resources for depression care. Patients recruited at intervention practices who score 10 or above on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 will have feedback regarding their depression screening results and preferences for care provided to their GP. The primary analysis will compare the number of cases of depression between the intervention and control groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the University of Newcastle Human Research Ethics Committee, and registered with Human Research Ethics Committees of the University of Wollongong, Monash University and University of New South Wales. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12618001139268; Pre-results.

Indexed as

DepressionPatient Care ManagementAdultAustraliaClinical AuditCluster AnalysisFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleMass ScreeningPatient PreferencePrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurveys and Questionnairesdepressionintervention studyprimary health carerandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID32047011
PMCPMC7044817
OpenAlexW3006022057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.