Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32047010›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Does a web-based decision aid improve informed choice for fertility preservation in women with breast cancer (DECISIF)? Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Alexandra Benoit, Michael Grynberg, Rémy Morello, Nathalie Sermondade, Guillaume Grandazzi, Grégoire Moutel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03591848 (Evaluation of an Online Decision Support Tool for Young Women With Breast Cancer During the Proposal for Preservation of Fertility), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03591848 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of an Online Decision Support Tool for Young Women With Breast Cancer During the Proposal for Preservation of Fertility

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2018 to 2020Enrolled186ConditionsBreast CancerArmsOnline support decision tool, standard oral information
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexandra BenoitUNICAEN, Inserm U1086, ANTICIPE, Normandie Université, Caen, France alexandra.benoit@aphp.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-9252-7672
Michael GrynbergDepartment of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Antoine-Béclère, Clamart, France.
Rémy MorelloUNICAEN, Inserm U1086, ANTICIPE, Normandie Universite, Caen, France.
Nathalie SermondadeDepartment of Cytogenetic and Reproductive Biology, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Bondy, France.
Guillaume GrandazziUNICAEN, Inserm U1086, ANTICIPE, Normandie Universite, Caen, France.
Grégoire MoutelUNICAEN, Inserm U1086, ANTICIPE, Normandie Universite, Caen, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChemotherapy may cause infertility in young survivors of breast cancer. Various fertility preservation techniques increase the likelihood of survivors becoming genetic mothers. Disclosure of cancer diagnosis may impact decision making about fertility preservation. This protocol will develop and test the effectiveness of a web-based decision aid for helping women with breast cancer to make well-informed choices about fertility preservation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be conducted in three phases using mixed methods. In phase I, the aim is to develop a web-based patient decision aid (PDA) in French with a steering committee and using a focus group of five women already treated for breast cancer. In phase II, the face validity of the decision aid will be assessed using questionnaires. In phase III, the PDA will be assessed by a two-arm randomised controlled trial. This will involve a quantitative evaluation of the PDA in clinical practice comparing the quality of the decision-making process between usual care and the PDA. The primary outcome will be informed choice and its components. The secondary outcomes will be decisional conflict and anxiety. Data will be collected during and after an oncofertility consultation. Phase III is underway. Since September 2018, 52 participants have been enrolled in the study and have completed the survey. We expect to have results by February 2020 for a total of 186 patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol was approved by the Ouest V Research Ethics Board. Results will be spread through peer-reviewed publications, and reported at suitable meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The ClinicalTrials.gov registry .(NCT03591848).

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDecision MakingDecision Support TechniquesFertility PreservationInfertility, FemaleInternet-Based InterventionAdultBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicbreast cancerdecision-making processfertility preservationinformed choicestudy protocolweb-based decision aid

Identifiers

PMID32047010
PMCPMC7044978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.