Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32046987›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based mental health2020

Predicting patient engagement in IAPT services: a statistical analysis of electronic health records.

Alice Davis, Theresa Smith, Jenny Talbot, Chris Eldridge, David Betts

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based mental health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alice DavisDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, UK A.Davis@bath.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9770-6741
Theresa SmithDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Jenny TalbotDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Chris EldridgeDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
David BettsDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
University of Bath · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcross England, 12% of all improving access to psychological therapy (IAPT) appointments are missed, and on average around 40% of first appointments are not attended, varying significantly around the country. In order to intervene effectively, it is important to target the patients who are most likely to miss their appointments.

objectiveThis research aims to develop and test a model to predict whether an IAPT patient will attend their first appointment.

methodsData from 19 adult IAPT services were analysed in this research. A multiple logistic regression was used at an individual service level to identify which patient, appointment and referral characteristics are associated with attendance. These variables were then used in a generalised linear mixed effects model (GLMM). We allow random effects in the GLMM for variables where we observe high service to service heterogeneity in the estimated effects from service specific logistic regressions.

findingsWe find that patients who self-refer are more likely to attend their appointments with an OR of 1.04. The older a patient is, the fewer the number of previous referrals and consenting to receiving a reminder short message service are also found to increase the likelihood of attendance with ORs of 1.02, 1.10, 1.04, respectively.

conclusionsOur model is expected to help IAPT services identify which patients are not likely to attend their appointments by highlighting key characteristics that affect attendance. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This analysis will help to identify methods IAPT services could use to increase their attendance rates.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overElectronic Health RecordsEnglandFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedNo-Show PatientsPatient ParticipationPsychotherapyReferral and ConsultationYoung Adultanxiety disordersdepression and mood disorders

Identifiers

PMID32046987
PMCPMC7034348
OpenAlexW3006310245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.