ArticleEvidence-based mental health2020
Predicting patient engagement in IAPT services: a statistical analysis of electronic health records.
Article in Evidence-based mental health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Recovery, completion and further referral after Improving Access to Psychological Therapies in Norfolk and Waveney.BJPsych open · 2025Article
- Generative AI-Enabled Therapy Support Tool for Improved Clinical Outcomes and Patient Engagement in Group Therapy: Real-World Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Observational
- Article
- Operationalising routinely collected patient data in research to further the pursuit of social justice and health equity: a team-based scoping review.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Data-Driven Exploration of National Health Service Talking Therapies Care Pathways Using Process Mining: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR mental health · 2024Article
- Decision analysis framework for predicting no-shows to appointments using machine learning algorithms.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Telephone treatments in Improving Access to Psychological Therapies services: an analysis of use and impact on treatment uptake.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Development and validation of an inflammatory bowel disease nutrition self-screening tool (IBD-NST) for digital use.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Predictors of Dropout in a Digital Intervention for the Prevention and Treatment of Depression in Patients With Chronic Back Pain: Secondary Analysis of Two Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Prevalence of depression and anxiety in people with inflammatory bowel disease and associated healthcare use: population-based cohort study.Evidence-based mental health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcross England, 12% of all improving access to psychological therapy (IAPT) appointments are missed, and on average around 40% of first appointments are not attended, varying significantly around the country. In order to intervene effectively, it is important to target the patients who are most likely to miss their appointments.
objectiveThis research aims to develop and test a model to predict whether an IAPT patient will attend their first appointment.
methodsData from 19 adult IAPT services were analysed in this research. A multiple logistic regression was used at an individual service level to identify which patient, appointment and referral characteristics are associated with attendance. These variables were then used in a generalised linear mixed effects model (GLMM). We allow random effects in the GLMM for variables where we observe high service to service heterogeneity in the estimated effects from service specific logistic regressions.
findingsWe find that patients who self-refer are more likely to attend their appointments with an OR of 1.04. The older a patient is, the fewer the number of previous referrals and consenting to receiving a reminder short message service are also found to increase the likelihood of attendance with ORs of 1.02, 1.10, 1.04, respectively.
conclusionsOur model is expected to help IAPT services identify which patients are not likely to attend their appointments by highlighting key characteristics that affect attendance. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This analysis will help to identify methods IAPT services could use to increase their attendance rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.