Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32046701›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2020

A comprehensive tool for creating and evaluating privacy-preserving biomedical prediction models.

Johanna Eicher, Raffael Bild, Helmut Spengler, Klaus A Kuhn, Fabian Prasser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Ensemble Learning Using Individual Neonatal Data for Seizure Detection.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2022
    Article
  3. Differential privacy in health research: A scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Johanna EicherSchool of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich, 81675, Germany. johanna.eicher@tum.de.ORCID 0000-0003-4871-0282
Raffael BildSchool of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich, 81675, Germany.
Helmut SpenglerSchool of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich, 81675, Germany.
Klaus A KuhnSchool of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich, 81675, Germany.
Fabian PrasserBerlin Institute of Health (BIH), Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Straße 2, Berlin, 10178, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DEBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DETUM Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModern data driven medical research promises to provide new insights into the development and course of disease and to enable novel methods of clinical decision support. To realize this, machine learning models can be trained to make predictions from clinical, paraclinical and biomolecular data. In this process, privacy protection and regulatory requirements need careful consideration, as the resulting models may leak sensitive personal information. To counter this threat, a wide range of methods for integrating machine learning with formal methods of privacy protection have been proposed. However, there is a significant lack of practical tools to create and evaluate such privacy-preserving models. In this software article, we report on our ongoing efforts to bridge this gap.

resultsWe have extended the well-known ARX anonymization tool for biomedical data with machine learning techniques to support the creation of privacy-preserving prediction models. Our methods are particularly well suited for applications in biomedicine, as they preserve the truthfulness of data (e.g. no noise is added) and they are intuitive and relatively easy to explain to non-experts. Moreover, our implementation is highly versatile, as it supports binomial and multinomial target variables, different types of prediction models and a wide range of privacy protection techniques. All methods have been integrated into a sound framework that supports the creation, evaluation and refinement of models through intuitive graphical user interfaces. To demonstrate the broad applicability of our solution, we present three case studies in which we created and evaluated different types of privacy-preserving prediction models for breast cancer diagnosis, diagnosis of acute inflammation of the urinary system and prediction of the contraceptive method used by women. In this process, we also used a wide range of different privacy models (k-anonymity, differential privacy and a game-theoretic approach) as well as different data transformation techniques.

conclusionsWith the tool presented in this article, accurate prediction models can be created that preserve the privacy of individuals represented in the training set in a variety of threat scenarios. Our implementation is available as open source software.

Indexed as

ConfidentialityData AnonymizationDecision Support Systems, ClinicalModels, StatisticalSoftwareBiomedical ResearchHumansMachine LearningReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveBiomedical dataClassificationData anonymizationMachine learningPrediction modelsPrivacy protection

Identifiers

PMID32046701
PMCPMC7014648
OpenAlexW3009014871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.