Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32046699›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2020

Will applications on smartphones allow a generalization of telemedicine?

F A Allaert, L Legrand, N Abdoul Carime, C Quantin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Development of Telemedicine and eHealth in Surgery during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. 5G in healthcare: how fast will be the transformation?Irish journal of medical science · 2021
    Article
  11. More room for telemedicine after COVID-19: lessons for primary care?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Telemedicine: Embracing virtual care during COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

F A AllaertChaire d'évaluation Médicale des Allégations de Santé BSB et groupe CEN, Dijon, France.
L LegrandService de Biostatistiques et d'Information Médicale (DIM), CHRU Dijon; Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-21000, Dijon, France.
N Abdoul CarimeService de Biostatistiques et d'Information Médicale (DIM), CHRU Dijon; Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-21000, Dijon, France.
C QuantinService de Biostatistiques et d'Information Médicale (DIM), CHRU Dijon; Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-21000, Dijon, France. catherine.quantin@chu-dijon.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-5134-9411

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelemedicine is one of the healthcare sectors that has developed the most in recent years. Currently, telemedicine is mostly used for patients who have difficulty attending medical consultations because of where they live (teleconsultation) or for specialist referrals when no specialist of a given discipline is locally available (telexpertise). However, the use of specific equipment (with dedicated cameras, screens, and computers) and the need for institutional infrastructure made the deployment and use of these systems expensive and rigid. Although many telemedicine systems have been tested, most have not generally gone beyond local projects. Our hypothesis is that the use of smartphones will allow health care providers to overcome some of the limitations that we have exposed, thus allowing the generalization of telemedicine. MAIN BODY: This paper addresses the problem of telemedicine applications, the market of which is growing fast. Their development may completely transform the organization of healthcare systems, change the way patients are managed and revolutionize prevention. This new organization should facilitate the lives of both patients and doctors. In this paper, we examine why telemedicine has failed for years to take its rightful place in many European healthcare systems although there was a real need. By developing the example of France, this article analyses the reasons most commonly put forth: the administrative and legal difficulties, and the lack of funding. We argue that the real reason telemedicine struggled to find its place was because the technology was not close enough to the patient.

conclusionFinally, we explain how the development of smartphones and their current ubiquitousness should allow the generalization of telemedicine in France and on a global scale.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsSmartphoneDelivery of Health CareFranceHumansRemote ConsultationTelemedicineCost effectivenessSmartphonesTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32046699
PMCPMC7014733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.