ArticleBMC urology2020
An evaluation of the real world use and clinical utility of the Cxbladder Monitor assay in the follow-up of patients previously treated for bladder cancer.
Article in BMC urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05349812 (An Observational Study of Cxbladder Performance for Detection or Rule-out of Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Observational Study of Cxbladder Performance for Detection or Rule-out of Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Noninvasive Tests for Bladder Cancer Detection and Surveillance: A Systematic Review of Commercially Available Assays.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Pooled it
- Urinary biomarkers for bladder cancer diagnosis and NMIBC follow-up: a systematic review.World journal of urology · 2023Pooled it
- Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.Future science OA · 2026Review
- Urinary Biomarkers and Their Role in the Management of Urothelial Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A novel bladder cancer surveillance schedule using bladder Cx for patients on annual surveillance.BJUI compass · 2025Article
- Distinct longitudinal patterns of urine tumor DNA in patients undergoing surveillance for bladder cancer.Molecular oncology · 2024Observational
- Analytical Validation of CxbladderDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Metabolomic Signatures of Treatment Response in Bladder Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Molecular Markers for Bladder Cancer Screening: An Insight into Bladder Cancer and FDA-Approved Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Article
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Roles of Urine Nectin-2 and Nectin-4 in Human Bladder Cancer.Cancers · 2023Article
- The Role of Novel Bladder Cancer Diagnostic and Surveillance Biomarkers-What Should a Urologist Really Know?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Bladder cancer detection in patients with neurogenic bladder: are cystoscopy and cytology effective, and are biomarkers pertinent as future diagnostic tools? A scoping review.World journal of urology · 2022Article
- Review
- The Development of Non-Invasive Diagnostic Tools in Bladder Cancer.OncoTargets and therapy · 2022Review
- Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor May Avoid Cystoscopies in Patients Under "Active Surveillance" for Recurrent Bladder Cancer (BIAS Project): Longitudinal Cohort Study.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Prominence of urinary biomarkers for bladder cancer in the COVID-19 era: From the commercially available to new prospective candidates.Investigative and clinical urology · 2021Review
- Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers in Urine: A Route towards Molecular Diagnosis and Personalized Medicine of Bladder Cancer.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- Biomarkers in Bladder Cancer Surveillance.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Review
- The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Genitourinary Cancer Care: Re-envisioning the Future.European urology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurveilling recurrent urothelial carcinoma (UC) requires frequent cystoscopy, which is invasive, expensive and time-consuming. An accurate urinary biomarker has the potential to reduce the number of cystoscopies required during post-treatment surveillance.
objectiveTo audit the clinical utility of a new surveillance protocol incorporating the Cxbladder Monitor (CxbM) test in real-world practice.
methodsThree hospitals implemented a new surveillance protocol. Patients were risk stratified, and then provided urine samples for CxbM testing. Low-risk CxbM-positive patients and all high-risk patients had cystoscopy at 2-3 months. Low-risk CxbM-negative patients had cystoscopy at ~ 12 months.
results443 CxbM tests were conducted on samples from 309 patients: 257 (83.2%) low-risk and 52 (16.8%) high-risk. No pathology-confirmed recurrences were seen in low-risk CxbM-negative patients (n = 108) during the first post-CxbM cystoscopy undertaken a mean ± SD 10.3 ± 3.9 months after testing. Three recurrences were detected during cystoscopy at 2.7 ± 3.4 months in 53 low-risk CxbM-positive patients. In 49 high-risk patients, 39 (79.6%) were CxbM-negative with no pathology-confirmed recurrences. Ten high-risk patients (20.4%) were CxbM-positive with four confirmed recurrences; 2 high-grade and 2 low-grade. The median time to first cystoscopy was 12.13 (95% CI: 11.97-12.4) months in patients with a CxbM-negative result versus 1.63 (95% CI: 1.13-2.3) months in patients with a CxbM-positive result (p < 0.00001). No positive cases were missed, no patients progressed to invasive or metastatic disease, and no patient died of cancer over 35 months of follow-up.
conclusionsCxbM accurately identified a high proportion of patients (77.8%) who were safely managed with only one cystoscopy per year. Including CxbM in the protocol for patient surveillance provided clinical utility by reducing the average number of annual cystoscopies by approximately 39%, thereby sparing patients the potential discomfort and anxiety, without compromising detection rates. No advantage was observed for risk stratification prior to CxbM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.