Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32046687›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2020

An evaluation of the real world use and clinical utility of the Cxbladder Monitor assay in the follow-up of patients previously treated for bladder cancer.

Madhusudan Koya, Sue Osborne, Christophe Chemaslé, Sima Porten, Anne Schuckman, Andrew Kennedy-Smith

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05349812 (An Observational Study of Cxbladder Performance for Detection or Rule-out of Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05349812 withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

An Observational Study of Cxbladder Performance for Detection or Rule-out of Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorPacific Edge LimitedRan2022 to 2023Enrolled0ConditionsUpper Tract Urinary Carcinoma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Analytical Validation of CxbladderDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Metabolomic Signatures of Treatment Response in Bladder Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Role of Novel Bladder Cancer Diagnostic and Surveillance Biomarkers-What Should a Urologist Really Know?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Biomarkers in Bladder Cancer Surveillance.Frontiers in surgery · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Madhusudan KoyaWaitemata District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.
Sue OsborneWaitemata District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand. Sue.Osborne@waitematadhb.govt.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8143-2299
Christophe ChemasléMid Central District Health Board, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Sima PortenUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Anne SchuckmanUSC Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Andrew Kennedy-SmithCapital & Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand.
Waitemata District Health Board · NZCapital and Coast District Health Board · NZPalmerston North Hospital · NZUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurveilling recurrent urothelial carcinoma (UC) requires frequent cystoscopy, which is invasive, expensive and time-consuming. An accurate urinary biomarker has the potential to reduce the number of cystoscopies required during post-treatment surveillance.

objectiveTo audit the clinical utility of a new surveillance protocol incorporating the Cxbladder Monitor (CxbM) test in real-world practice.

methodsThree hospitals implemented a new surveillance protocol. Patients were risk stratified, and then provided urine samples for CxbM testing. Low-risk CxbM-positive patients and all high-risk patients had cystoscopy at 2-3 months. Low-risk CxbM-negative patients had cystoscopy at ~ 12 months.

results443 CxbM tests were conducted on samples from 309 patients: 257 (83.2%) low-risk and 52 (16.8%) high-risk. No pathology-confirmed recurrences were seen in low-risk CxbM-negative patients (n = 108) during the first post-CxbM cystoscopy undertaken a mean ± SD 10.3 ± 3.9 months after testing. Three recurrences were detected during cystoscopy at 2.7 ± 3.4 months in 53 low-risk CxbM-positive patients. In 49 high-risk patients, 39 (79.6%) were CxbM-negative with no pathology-confirmed recurrences. Ten high-risk patients (20.4%) were CxbM-positive with four confirmed recurrences; 2 high-grade and 2 low-grade. The median time to first cystoscopy was 12.13 (95% CI: 11.97-12.4) months in patients with a CxbM-negative result versus 1.63 (95% CI: 1.13-2.3) months in patients with a CxbM-positive result (p < 0.00001). No positive cases were missed, no patients progressed to invasive or metastatic disease, and no patient died of cancer over 35 months of follow-up.

conclusionsCxbM accurately identified a high proportion of patients (77.8%) who were safely managed with only one cystoscopy per year. Including CxbM in the protocol for patient surveillance provided clinical utility by reducing the average number of annual cystoscopies by approximately 39%, thereby sparing patients the potential discomfort and anxiety, without compromising detection rates. No advantage was observed for risk stratification prior to CxbM.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorCohort StudiesCystoscopyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorBladder cancerCystoscopyGenomic rule-out testRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID32046687
PMCPMC7014779
OpenAlexW3007230236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.