Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32046683›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

A probabilistic approach for economic evaluation of occupational health and safety interventions: a case study of silica exposure reduction interventions in the construction sector.

Amirabbas Mofidi, Emile Tompa, Seyed Bagher Mortazavi, Akbar Esfahanipour, Paul A Demers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Economic evaluations in occupational health: what brings the best bang for the buck?Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amirabbas MofidiInstitute for Work & Health, 481 University Ave Suite 800, Toronto, ON, M5G 2E9, Canada.
Emile TompaInstitute for Work & Health, 481 University Ave Suite 800, Toronto, ON, M5G 2E9, Canada.
Seyed Bagher MortazaviInstitute for Work & Health, 481 University Ave Suite 800, Toronto, ON, M5G 2E9, Canada. mortazav@modares.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9454-0598
Akbar EsfahanipourDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Paul A DemersOccupational Cancer Research Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Cancer Society (CCS) grant 701285-00Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) of Ontario grant ROP-15-R-026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConstruction workers are at a high risk of exposure to various types of hazardous substances such as crystalline silica. Though multiple studies indicate the evidence regarding the effectiveness of different silica exposure reduction interventions in the construction sector, the decisions for selecting a specific silica exposure reduction intervention are best informed by an economic evaluation. Economic evaluation of interventions is subjected to uncertainties in practice, mostly due to the lack of precise data on important variables. In this study, we aim to identify the most cost-beneficial silica exposure reduction intervention for the construction sector under uncertain situations.

methodsWe apply a probabilistic modeling approach that covers a large number of variables relevant to the cost of lung cancer, as well as the costs of silica exposure reduction interventions. To estimate the societal lifetime cost of lung cancer, we use an incidence cost approach. To estimate the net benefit of each intervention, we compare the expected cost of lung cancer cases averted, with expected cost of implementation of the intervention in one calendar year. Sensitivity analysis is used to quantify how different variables affect interventions net benefit.

resultsA positive net benefit is expected for all considered interventions. The highest number of lung cancer cases are averted by combined use of wet method, local exhaust ventilation and personal protective equipment, about 107 cases, with expected net benefit of $45.9 million. Results also suggest that the level of exposure is an important determinant for the selection of the most cost-beneficial intervention.

conclusionsThis study provides important insights for decision makers about silica exposure reduction interventions in the construction sector. It also provides an overview of the potential advantages of using probabilistic modeling approach to undertake economic evaluations, particularly when researchers are confronted with a large number of uncertain variables.

Indexed as

Construction IndustryCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansLung NeoplasmsOccupational ExposureOccupational HealthPersonal Protective EquipmentProbabilitySilicon DioxideVentilationSilicon DioxideBayesian networksCost-benefit analysisLung cancerNet benefitProbabilistic modeling approachUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID32046683
PMCPMC7014628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.