ArticleBMC pediatrics2020
Protocol for Correcting Residual Errors with Spectral, ULtrasound, Traditional Speech therapy Randomized Controlled Trial (C-RESULTS RCT).
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Correcting Residual Errors With Spectral, Ultrasound, and Traditional Speech Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Online Assessment and Enhancement of Auditory Perception for Speech Sound Errors: Visual Acoustic Biofeedback for RSE Via Telepractice
Online Assessment and Enhancement of Auditory Perception for Speech Sound Errors: Online Perceptual Training for RSE
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effectiveness of Ultrasound Visual Biofeedback in Articulation Therapy for Children and Adolescents With Speech Sound Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of language & communication disordersPooled it
- Rhotic Generalization Is More Rapid in Biofeedback Than Motor-Based Treatment for Residual Speech Sound Disorder: Secondary Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Trial
- Comparing Biofeedback Types for Children With Residual /ɹ/ Errors in American English: A Single-Case Randomization Design.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2021Trial
- Online Assessment and Enhancement of Auditory Perception for Residual /ɹ/ Distortions.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- Sensory acuity and cross-language phonetic similarity jointly predict second language vowel production accuracy.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Ultrasound Tongue Imaging in Research and Practice with People with Cleft Palate ± Cleft Lip.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2025Review
- Protocol for visual-acoustic intervention with service delivery in-person and via telepractice (VISIT) non-inferiority trial for residual speech sound disorder.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Speech Therapy for /ɹ/: A Single-Case Experimental Study.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2024Article
- Traditional and Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback Treatment via Telepractice for Residual Speech Sound Disorders Affecting /ɹ/: Pilot study.Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups · 2023Article
- Reproducible Speech Research With the Artificial Intelligence-Ready PERCEPT Corpora.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Article
- Auditory and Somatosensory Development for Speech in Later Childhood.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Article
- Tutorial: Using Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback for Speech Sound Training.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2023Review
- Baseline Stimulability Predicts Patterns of Response to Traditional and Ultrasound Biofeedback Treatment for Residual Speech Sound Disorder.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022Article
- Protocol for SonoSpeech Cleft Pilot: a mixed-methods pilot randomized control trial of ultrasound visual biofeedback versus standard intervention for children with cleft lip and palate.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2022Article
- Telepractice Treatment of Residual Rhotic Errors Using App-Based Biofeedback: A Pilot Study.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2022Article
- Toward an index of oral somatosensory acuity: Comparison of three measures in adults.Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSpeech sound disorder in childhood poses a barrier to academic and social participation, with potentially lifelong consequences for educational and occupational outcomes. While most speech errors resolve by the late school-age years, between 2 and 5% of speakers exhibit residual speech errors (RSE) that persist through adolescence or even adulthood. Previous findings from small-scale studies suggest that interventions incorporating visual biofeedback can outperform traditional motor-based treatment approaches for children with RSE, but this question has not been investigated in a well-powered randomized controlled trial. METHODS/
designThis project, Correcting Residual Errors with Spectral, ULtrasound, Traditional Speech therapy Randomized Controlled Trial (C-RESULTS RCT), aims to treat 110 children in a parallel randomized controlled clinical trial comparing biofeedback and non-biofeedback interventions for RSE affecting the North American English rhotic sound /ɹ/. Eligible children will be American English speakers, aged 9-15 years, who exhibit RSE affecting /ɹ/ but otherwise show typical cognitive-linguistic and hearing abilities. Participants will be randomized, with stratification by site (Syracuse University or Montclair State University) and pre-treatment speech production ability, to receive either a motor-based treatment consistent with current best practices in speech therapy (40% of participants) or treatment incorporating visual biofeedback (60% of participants). Within the biofeedback condition, participants will be assigned in equal numbers to receive biofeedback in the form of a real-time visual display of the acoustic signal of speech or ultrasound imaging of the tongue during speech. The primary outcome measure will assess changes in the acoustics of children's production of /ɹ/ during treatment, while a secondary outcome measure will use blinded listeners to evaluate changes in the perceived accuracy of /ɹ/ production after the completion of all treatment. These measures will allow the treatment conditions to be compared with respect to both efficacy and efficiency. DISCUSSION: By conducting the first well-powered randomized controlled trial comparing treatment with and without biofeedback, this study aims to provide high-quality evidence to guide treatment decisions for children with RSE.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03737318, November 9, 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.