Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32046671›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2020

Protocol for Correcting Residual Errors with Spectral, ULtrasound, Traditional Speech therapy Randomized Controlled Trial (C-RESULTS RCT).

Tara McAllister, Jonathan L Preston, Elaine R Hitchcock, Jennifer Hill

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03737318 nacompletednot on this map

Correcting Residual Errors With Spectral, Ultrasound, and Traditional Speech Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNew York UniversityRan2019 to 2024Enrolled108ConditionsSpeech Sound DisorderArmsBiofeedback-ultrasound, Biofeedback--visual-acoustic, Traditional articulation treatment
NCT04858022 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Online Assessment and Enhancement of Auditory Perception for Speech Sound Errors: Visual Acoustic Biofeedback for RSE Via Telepractice

TypeinterventionalSponsorMontclair State UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsSpeech Sound DisorderArmsVisual-Acoustic Biofeedback Treatment, No Treatment
NCT04858035 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Online Assessment and Enhancement of Auditory Perception for Speech Sound Errors: Online Perceptual Training for RSE

TypeinterventionalSponsorMontclair State UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled10ConditionsSpeech Sound DisorderArmsPerceptual training, Production training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Online Assessment and Enhancement of Auditory Perception for Residual /ɹ/ Distortions.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Ultrasound Tongue Imaging in Research and Practice with People with Cleft Palate ± Cleft Lip.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Reproducible Speech Research With the Artificial Intelligence-Ready PERCEPT Corpora.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023
    Article
  11. Auditory and Somatosensory Development for Speech in Later Childhood.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023
    Article
  12. Tutorial: Using Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback for Speech Sound Training.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tara McAllisterDepartment of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Jonathan L PrestonDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Syracuse University, 621 Skytop Rd, Suite 1200, Syracuse, NY, 13244, USA. jopresto@syr.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9971-6321
Elaine R HitchcockDepartment of Communication Sciences & Disorders, Montclair State University, Bloomfield, NJ, USA.
Jennifer HillDepartment of Applied Statistics, Social Science, and the Humanities, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
New York University · USMontclair State University · USSyracuse University · US

Funding

Biofeedback-Enhanced Treatment for Speech Sound Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial and Delineation of Sensorimotor SubtypesR01DC017476 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Tara McAllister · 2019 to 2026
$5.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpeech sound disorder in childhood poses a barrier to academic and social participation, with potentially lifelong consequences for educational and occupational outcomes. While most speech errors resolve by the late school-age years, between 2 and 5% of speakers exhibit residual speech errors (RSE) that persist through adolescence or even adulthood. Previous findings from small-scale studies suggest that interventions incorporating visual biofeedback can outperform traditional motor-based treatment approaches for children with RSE, but this question has not been investigated in a well-powered randomized controlled trial. METHODS/

designThis project, Correcting Residual Errors with Spectral, ULtrasound, Traditional Speech therapy Randomized Controlled Trial (C-RESULTS RCT), aims to treat 110 children in a parallel randomized controlled clinical trial comparing biofeedback and non-biofeedback interventions for RSE affecting the North American English rhotic sound /ɹ/. Eligible children will be American English speakers, aged 9-15 years, who exhibit RSE affecting /ɹ/ but otherwise show typical cognitive-linguistic and hearing abilities. Participants will be randomized, with stratification by site (Syracuse University or Montclair State University) and pre-treatment speech production ability, to receive either a motor-based treatment consistent with current best practices in speech therapy (40% of participants) or treatment incorporating visual biofeedback (60% of participants). Within the biofeedback condition, participants will be assigned in equal numbers to receive biofeedback in the form of a real-time visual display of the acoustic signal of speech or ultrasound imaging of the tongue during speech. The primary outcome measure will assess changes in the acoustics of children's production of /ɹ/ during treatment, while a secondary outcome measure will use blinded listeners to evaluate changes in the perceived accuracy of /ɹ/ production after the completion of all treatment. These measures will allow the treatment conditions to be compared with respect to both efficacy and efficiency. DISCUSSION: By conducting the first well-powered randomized controlled trial comparing treatment with and without biofeedback, this study aims to provide high-quality evidence to guide treatment decisions for children with RSE.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03737318, November 9, 2018.

Indexed as

SpeechSpeech DisordersSpeech TherapyAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUltrasonographyBiofeedbackRandomized controlled trialSpeech sound disorder

Identifiers

PMID32046671
PMCPMC7014674
OpenAlexW3007153393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.