Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32046447›Full record

ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2020

Cervical Augmentation with an Injectable Silk-Based Gel: Biocompatibility in a Rat Model of Pregnancy.

Bouchra Koullali, Yali Zhang, Ashley Peterson, Nicole Raia, David L Kaplan, Michael D House

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bouchra KoullaliMother Infant Research Institute, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Yali ZhangMother Infant Research Institute, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Ashley PetersonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Nicole RaiaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
David L KaplanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Michael D HouseMother Infant Research Institute, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. mhouse@tuftsmedicalcenter.org.
Tufts Medical Center · USTufts University · US

Funding

Injectable Gels for Tissue AugmentationR01EB021264 · NIBIB · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI HOUSE, MICHAEL DOUGLAS, KAPLAN, DAVID L. · 2016 to 2019
$1.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB021264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to study the biocompatibility of an injectable silk gel in the cervix in a rat model of pregnancy. The rationale is to study an injectable gel as an alternate treatment for cervical insufficiency. We further aimed to perform cervical injections via a vaginal route to mimic the clinical procedure of a cervical cerclage. We performed an in vivo study in pregnant female Sprague Dawley rats. Cervical procedures were performed using a customized speculum under general anesthesia. Injections were performed on gestational day 16. The responses to silk gel injections were compared to polyethylene terephthalate suture and saline controls on gestational day 19 and postpartum. The inflammatory response was evaluated by histology, PCR for inflammatory gene expression, and ELISA for protein levels of proinflammatory mediators. Silk gel injections were performed on 13 animals. All animals tolerated the procedure. Silk gel occupied 5% of the stroma after injection. Injected silk gel caused neither preterm birth nor prolonged pregnancy and had no effect on the kits. When comparing inflammatory responses, expression of inflammatory genes and proinflammatory proteins in the silk gel group was intermediate between saline (lowest) and cerclage suture (highest). Injectable silk gel was more inflammatory compared to saline injections but less inflammatory compared to the suture material used for cervical cerclage. This study is an important step toward development of an alternative treatment for cervical insufficiency.

Indexed as

GelsMaterials TestingAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCerclage, CervicalFemalePregnancyRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySilkUterine Cervical IncompetenceBiocompatible MaterialsGelsSilkCerclageCervical insufficiencyInjectable gelPreterm birth

Identifiers

PMID32046447
PMCPMC7255554
OpenAlexW2999505242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.