ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2020
Cervical Augmentation with an Injectable Silk-Based Gel: Biocompatibility in a Rat Model of Pregnancy.
Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Overview of Silk Fibroin Injectable Hydrogels: Advances and Applications in Regenerative Medicine.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- The role of cervical microbiome in cervical incompetence: insights from 16 S rRNA metagenomic sequencing.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Evaluation and Application of Silk Fibroin Based Biomaterials to Promote Cartilage Regeneration in Osteoarthritis Therapy.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Effect of Bushen Antai recipe on pyroptosis mechanism of subclinical hypothyroidism decidual cells in early pregnancy.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study was to study the biocompatibility of an injectable silk gel in the cervix in a rat model of pregnancy. The rationale is to study an injectable gel as an alternate treatment for cervical insufficiency. We further aimed to perform cervical injections via a vaginal route to mimic the clinical procedure of a cervical cerclage. We performed an in vivo study in pregnant female Sprague Dawley rats. Cervical procedures were performed using a customized speculum under general anesthesia. Injections were performed on gestational day 16. The responses to silk gel injections were compared to polyethylene terephthalate suture and saline controls on gestational day 19 and postpartum. The inflammatory response was evaluated by histology, PCR for inflammatory gene expression, and ELISA for protein levels of proinflammatory mediators. Silk gel injections were performed on 13 animals. All animals tolerated the procedure. Silk gel occupied 5% of the stroma after injection. Injected silk gel caused neither preterm birth nor prolonged pregnancy and had no effect on the kits. When comparing inflammatory responses, expression of inflammatory genes and proinflammatory proteins in the silk gel group was intermediate between saline (lowest) and cerclage suture (highest). Injectable silk gel was more inflammatory compared to saline injections but less inflammatory compared to the suture material used for cervical cerclage. This study is an important step toward development of an alternative treatment for cervical insufficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.