Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32046330›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2020

The Effects of Caffeine Ingestion on Measures of Rowing Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jozo Grgic, Francisco Javier Diaz-Lara, Juan Del Coso, Michael J Duncan, Jason Tallis, Craig Pickering, Brad J Schoenfeld, Pavle Mikulic

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Acute Effects of Caffeine Intake on Psychological Responses and High-Intensity Exercise Performance.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  14. The physiology of rowing with perspective on training and health.European journal of applied physiology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Jozo GrgicInstitute for Health and Sport (IHES), Victoria University, Melbourne, 3011, Australia.
Francisco Javier Diaz-LaraInstitute for Health and Sport (IHES), Victoria University, Melbourne, 3011, Australia.
Juan Del CosoCentre for Sport Studies, Rey Juan Carlos University, Fuenlabrada, 28943 Madrid, Spain.
Michael J DuncanCentre for Sport, Exercise and Life Sciences, Alison Gingell Building, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK.
Jason TallisCentre for Sport, Exercise and Life Sciences, Alison Gingell Building, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK.
Craig PickeringInstitute of Coaching and Performance, School of Sport and Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.
Brad J SchoenfeldDepartment of Health Sciences, Lehman College, Bronx 10468, NY, USA.
Pavle MikulicFaculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia.
Coventry University · GBVictoria University · AULehman College · USUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ESUniversity of Lancashire · GBUniversity of Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to conduct a systematic review and a meta-analysis of studies examining the acute effects of caffeine ingestion on measures of rowing performance. Crossover and placebo-controlled experiments that investigated the effects of caffeine ingestion on measures of rowing performance were included. The PEDro checklist was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Seven studies of good and excellent methodological quality were included. None of the included studies examined on-water rowing. The majority of studies that were included in the meta-analysis used a 2000m rowing distance with only one using 1000m distance. Results of the main meta-analysis indicated that caffeine enhances performance on a rowing ergometer compared to placebo with a mean difference of -4.1 s (95% confidence interval (CI): -6.4, -1.8 s). These values remained consistent in the analysis in which the study that used a 1000m distance was excluded (mean difference: -4.3 s; 95% CI: -6.9, -1.8 s). We also found a significant increase in mean power (mean difference: 5.7 W; 95% CI: 2.1, 9.3 W) and minute ventilation (mean difference: 3.4 L/min; 95% CI: 1.7, 5.1 L/min) following caffeine ingestion. No significant differences between caffeine and placebo were found for the rating of perceived exertion, oxygen consumption, respiratory exchange ratio, and heart rate. This meta-analysis found that acute caffeine ingestion improves 2000m rowing ergometer performance by ~4 s. Our results support the use of caffeine pre-exercise as an ergogenic aid for rowing performance.

Indexed as

SportsTask Performance and AnalysisCaffeineExerciseFemaleHumansMaleOxygen ConsumptionPerformance-Enhancing SubstancesPhysical ExertionPulmonary Gas ExchangeShipsCaffeinePerformance-Enhancing Substancescaffeineergogenic aidperformance-enhancing effect

Identifiers

PMID32046330
PMCPMC7071243
OpenAlexW3004891284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.