Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32046034›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Evaluation of the Use of Formalin-Fixed and Paraffin-Embedded Archive Gastric Tissues for Microbiota Characterization Using Next-Generation Sequencing.

Ines Pinto-Ribeiro, Rui M Ferreira, Joana Pereira-Marques, Vanessa Pinto, Guilherme Macedo, Fátima Carneiro, Ceu Figueiredo

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Esophageal microbiota composition and outcome of esophageal cancer treatment: a systematic review.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Colorectal Cancer Archaeome: A Metagenomic Exploration, Tunisia.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ines Pinto-RibeiroInstitute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (Ipatimup), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.
Rui M FerreiraInstitute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (Ipatimup), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.
Joana Pereira-MarquesInstitute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (Ipatimup), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.
Vanessa PintoInstitute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (Ipatimup), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.
Guilherme MacedoFaculty of Medicine of the University of Porto (FMUP), 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.
Fátima CarneiroInstitute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (Ipatimup), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.
Ceu FigueiredoInstitute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (Ipatimup), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PT

Funding

European Regional Development Fund POCI-01-0145-FEDER-032532Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia CEECIND/01854/2017Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia POCI-01-0145-FEDER-032532Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BD/110803/2015Programa Operacional Temático Factores de Competitividade POCI-01-0145-FEDER-032532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large numbers of well-characterized clinical samples are fundamental to establish relevant associations between the microbiota and disease. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are routinely used and are widely available clinical materials. Since current approaches to study the microbiota are based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) targeting the bacterial 16S rRNA gene, our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of FFPE gastric tissues for NGS-based microbiota characterization. Analysis of sequencing data revealed the presence of bacteria in the paraffin control. After the subtraction of the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) present in the paraffin control to the FFPE tissue sample dataset, we evaluated the microbiota profiles between paired FFPE and frozen gastric tissues, and between different times of archiving. Compared with frozen gastric tissues, we detected a lower number of OTUs in the microbiota of paired FFPE tissues, regardless of the time of archiving. No major differences in microbial diversity were identified, but taxonomic variation in the relative abundance of phyla and orders was observed between the two preservation methods. This variation was also evident in each case and throughout the times of FFPE archiving. The use of FFPE tissues for NGS-based microbiota characterization should be considered carefully, as biases can be introduced by the embedding process and the time of tissue archiving.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicFixativesFormaldehydeGenome, BacterialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansParaffin EmbeddingRNA, Ribosomal, 16SStomachTissue FixationFixativesFormaldehydeRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA geneformalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissuesmicrobiotanext-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID32046034
PMCPMC7037826
OpenAlexW3004641622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.