Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32045732›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2020

Is monetary reward processing altered in drug-naïve youth with a behavioral addiction? Findings from internet gaming disorder.

Yuan-Wei Yao, Lu Liu, Patrick D Worhunsky, Sarah Lichenstein, Shan-Shan Ma, Lei Zhu, Xin-Hui Shi, Songshan Yang, Jin-Tao Zhang, Sarah W Yip

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Gaming disorder: Neural mechanisms and ongoing debates.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Body Focused Repetitive Behavior Disorders: Behavioral Models and Neurobiological Mechanisms.Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Yuan-Wei YaoState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning and IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Xinjiekouwai Street No.19, Beijing 100875, China; Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin 14195, Germany; Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany.
Lu LiuGerman Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal 14558, Germany.
Patrick D WorhunskyDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06519, USA.
Sarah LichensteinRadiology and Biomedical Engineering, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06519, USA.
Shan-Shan MaState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning and IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Xinjiekouwai Street No.19, Beijing 100875, China; Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Lei ZhuState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning and IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Xinjiekouwai Street No.19, Beijing 100875, China.
Xin-Hui ShiState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning and IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Xinjiekouwai Street No.19, Beijing 100875, China.
Songshan YangDepartment of Statistics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Jin-Tao ZhangState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning and IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Xinjiekouwai Street No.19, Beijing 100875, China. Electronic address: zhangjintao@bnu.edu.cn.
Sarah W YipDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06519, USA; Child Study Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06519, USA.
Beijing Normal University · CNYale University · USGerman Institute of Human Nutrition · DEMcGovern Institute for Brain Research · USPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
SUBSTANCE ABUSEK12DA000167 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHANIE S O'MALLEY, Marc N Potenza · 1991 to 2026
$17.7M
Neural mechanisms of galantamine treatment for cocaine dependenceK01DA039299 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI YIP, SARAH · 2016 to 2020
$905k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA039299NIDA NIH HHS K12 DA000167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current models of addiction biology highlight altered neural responses to non-drug rewards as a central feature of addiction. However, given that drugs of abuse can directly impact reward-related dopamine circuitry, it is difficult to determine the extent to which reward processing alterations are a trait feature of individuals with addictions, or primarily a consequence of exogenous drug exposure. Examining individuals with behavioral addictions is one promising approach for disentangling neural features of addiction from the direct effects of substance exposure. The current fMRI study compared neural responses during monetary reward processing between drug naïve young adults with a behavioral addiction, internet gaming disorder (IGD; n = 22), and healthy controls (n = 27) using a monetary incentive delay task. Relative to controls, individuals with IGD exhibited blunted caudate activity associated with loss magnitude at the outcome stage, but did not differ from controls in neural activity at other stages. These findings suggest that decreased loss sensitivity might be a critical feature of IGD, whereas alterations in gain processing may be less characteristic of individuals with IGD, relative to those with substance use disorders. Therefore, classic theories of altered reward processing in substance use disorders should be translated to behavioral addictions with caution.

Indexed as

RewardBrainHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedInternet Addiction DisorderMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroimagingYoung AdultBehavioral addictionInternet gaming disorderLoss aversionMonetary incentive delay taskReward processing

Identifiers

PMID32045732
PMCPMC7013339
OpenAlexW3005219364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.